USGBC
Excerpted from LEED 2009 for Commercial Interiors
COPYRIGHT © 2009 BY THE U.S. GREEN BUILDING COUNCIL, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVEDMR Pilot Credit 53: Responsible sourcing of raw materials
Intent
This is a pilot credit. To use any pilot credit on your LEED project, be sure to register here. Documentation requirements and additional questions are listed below.To encourage the use of products and materials for which life cycle information is available and that have environmentally, economically, and socially preferable life cycle impacts. To reward project teams for selecting products verified to have been extracted or sourced in a responsible manner.
Requirements
* This credit language is drawn from the LEED v4 draft. Where other point totals are noted, this pilot credit is worth 1 point in total. *
Option 1. raw material source and extraction reporting (1 point)
Use at least 20 permanently installed products from manufacturers that have publicly released a report from their raw material suppliers including the following:
- Raw material supplier extraction locations
- A commitment to long-term ecologically responsible land use
- A commitment to reducing environmental harms from extraction and/or manufacturing processes
- A commitment to meeting applicable standards or programs voluntarily that address responsible sourcing criteria
Products must be sourced from at least 5 different manufacturers.
Products will be valued as follows:
- Manufacturer declared reports are valued as one half (1/2) of a product.
- Third-party verified corporate sustainability reports (CSR) including environmental impacts of extraction operations and activities associated with the manufacturer’s product and the product’s supply chain, are valued as one whole product for purposes of calculation.
Acceptable frameworks for the CSR include the following:
- Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Sustainability Report
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Develoment (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises
- U.N. Global Compact: Communication of Progress
- ISO 26000: 2010 Guidance on Social Responsibility
- USGBC approved program: Other programs meeting the CSR criteria that become available will be evaluated and added as appropriate.
OR
Option 2. leadership extraction practices (1 point)
Use products that meet at least one of the responsible extraction criteria below for at least 25%, by cost, of the total value of permanently installed building products in the project.
- Bio-based materials. Bio-based products must meet the Sustainable Agriculture Network’s Sustainable Agriculture Standard. Bio-based raw materials must be tested using ASTMVoluntary standards development organization which creates source technical standards for materials, products, systems, and services Test Method D6866 and be legally harvested, as defined by the exporting and receiving country. Exclude hide products, such as leather and other animal skin material.
- New wood products. Wood products must be certified by the Forest Stewardship Council or USGBC-approved equivalent.
- Materials reuse. Reuse includes salvaged, refurbished, or reused products.
- Recycled content. Recycled content is the sum of postconsumer recycled content plus one-half the preconsumer recycled content, based on cost.
- USGBC approved program. Other programs for other material types meeting leadership extraction criteria that become available will be evaluated and added as appropriate.
Products that meet the above criteria are valued according to source location (extraction, manufacture, and purchase point must be within the distances noted below):
- Products sourced within 100 miles of the project site are valued at 200% of their cost.
- Products sourced domestically within 500 miles of the project site are valued at 150% of their cost.
Final product value is determined by the following equation:
(base product value x valuation factor based on extraction criteria)*(valuation factor based on location)
Structure and enclosure materials may not constitute more than 30% of the value of compliant building products. An individual product may be counted in more than one attribute category. If only a fraction of a product or material meets the requirements, then only the fraction, based on weight, contributes toward the credit.
For the scope of this credit, furniture, piping, pipe insulation, ducts, duct insulation, conduit, plumbing fixtures, faucets, showerheads, and lamp housing may be included if they are included consistently in cost-based Materials and Resources credits. Exclude wood products purchased for temporary use on the project.
Meet the requirements of the credit above and include furniture and furnishings within the project’s scope of work.
Credit specific:
Submit a list of products purchased contributing toward credit and their corresponding raw material. List the cost and number of items purchased per contributing products and calculate the weighted value according to total weight of materials purchased. Provide documentation showing adherence to applicable disclosure requirements.
Additional questions:
- The raw material sourcing disclosure reporting requirements does not specify a third party. However it is anticipated that in the near future Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) will be the only organization to support these reporting requirements. Were you able to purchase from manufacturers who source from raw material companies reporting to GRI? Were there other organizations meeting the reporting criteria? What were major challenges in finding compliant materials?
- What manufacturers where you able to find utilizing mined and quarried materials sourcing companies utilizing the Framework for Responsible Mining? Who are the early adopters?
Changes:
- Changes as a result of 3rd Public Comment (3/1/2012):
Raw material disclosure requirement was rolled into responsible extraction requirements.
Bio-based redefined to define other materials besides wood.
Labor practices and governance structure added to required publically available list for Other Extracted Materials.
Weightings added to materials sourced domestically, regionally and locally.
Recycled content and salvaged materials are not to be included in calculation.
FSCIndependent, third-party verification that forest products are produced and sold based on a set of criteria for forest management and chain-of-custody controls developed by the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), an international nonprofit organization. FSC criteria for certifying forests around the world address forest management, legal issues, indigenous rights, labor rights, multiple benefits, and environmental impacts. – Pure requirement replaced with FSC Certified - Changes as a result of 5th Public Comment (1/15/2013):
Modified to align with Building product disclosure and optimization - sourcing of raw materials
Potential Technologies & Strategies



3 Comments
Missing requirement on Pilot Form?
When I go to the current version of the pilot credit form at http://www.usgbc.org/ShowFile.aspx?DocumentID=10106 there is no actual Material Source Disclosure language within the credit itself. However, the narrative after indicates that you probably need to get suppliers to interact with GRI? The language on the form also does not match the language on this page.
Also, the form now includes the language: "Materials meeting applicable criteria below plus extracted and manufactured do-mestically are valued at 1.5 times the material cost, or regionally (within the state, province, or territory) at twice the material cost. Products and materials extracted and manufactured locally (within 50 miles or 80 km), are valued at three times the material cost. If project is located in the United States or Canada, products and materials meeting local criteria automatically qualify for this credit."
Does this mean that there are no reporting or public disclosure requirements on the manufacturer in the U.S. and Canada? If it does not, what is the intent of that last sentence?
Exclusions
If products have a % of recycled content which is assessed under MRc4 does this mean that the whole product is excluded from these calculations or just the portion which has the recycled content?
Vivien, I'm confused—what are you seeing as the relation between this credit and MRc4?
Start a new LEED comment thread