CS-2009 EAp3: Fundamental Refrigerant Management

  • NC_CS_Schools_EAp3_Type3_FundimentalRefrigerant Diagram
  • Eliminate CFC-based refrigerants

    This prerequisite focuses on the elimination of CFC-based refrigerants that contribute to ozone depletion in HVAC&R equipment. Although fire suppression systems are covered by EAc4, you're not required to consider them for this prerequisite. Doing so in conjunction with EAc4 is a good idea, however.

    The credit covers all space-conditioning and refrigeration systems included in the LEED scope of work, including chillers; unitary HVAC equipment (split and packaged); room and window air-conditioners; computer, data center, and telecom room-cooling units; and commercial refrigeration equipment. The prerequisite does not, however, apply to small units and other types of equipment, such as refrigerators and small water coolers that contain less than 0.5 pounds of refrigerant.

  • Easy prerequisite for new construction

    This is an easy prerequisite to meet, since installing equipment without CFC-based refrigerants is now standard practice in new construction. Nearly all industrialized nations have signed the Montreal Protocol, which called for a complete phase out of CFC-based refrigerants by 1995, and HCFCsHydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) are refrigerants that cause significantly less depletion of the stratospheric ozone layer than chlorofluorocarbons. by 2030 in developed countries. As a result, compliant, environmentally preferable refrigerants that comply with this prerequisite are the only option available for new systems. 

    Existing CFC-based equipment must be phased out

    If existing equipment or a district chilled water system is being used, it must be CFC-free—or you (or the owner of the system) must commit to phasing out CFC refrigerants through refrigerant conversion or equipment replacement within five years of “substantial completion” of your project. In either case, the annual leakage rateThe speed at which an appliance loses refrigerant, measured between refrigerant charges or over 12 months, whichever is shorter. The leakage rate is expressed in terms of the percentage of the appliance's full charge that would be lost over a 12-month period if the rate stabilized. (EPA Clean Air Act, Title VI, Rule 608). of CFC-based refrigerants must be reduced to 5% or less.

    If the owner of the district cooling system is unwilling to conduct a phase-out, while the economic analysis suggests that it should, in fact, be done, your project could forfeit LEED certification. In this case, you could install your own cooling system to achieve the prerequisite.

    Generally, equipment replacement is economically feasible because older systems are far less efficient than newer ones. However, an exemption can be granted if a third-party analysis shows that the replacement or conversion of the system is not economically feasible by nature of having a simple payback greater than ten years. 

    FAQs for EAp3

    What does third-party mean, with regards to the phase-out analysis? Can our HVAC consultant do it?

    Yes. Third party in this case means not the owner.

    My project will not use any mechanical ventilation system. Does that satisfy the requirements of this credit?

    Yes, if you also avoid CFC-based refrigerants in any fire suppression systems.

  • Specifics for core and shell projects

    Core-and-shell (CS) projects encompass all equipment within the project scope and LEED boundary, which may include ventilation systems for common areas and any heat pumps installed for tenant spaces. 

Legend

  • Best Practices
  • Gotcha
  • Action Steps
  • Cost Tip

Pre-Design

Expand All

  • If your project is using an existing HVAC system, investigate the type of refrigerant being used. If CFCs are being used, discuss equipment or conversion options with the building manager and owner. 


  • If HCFCs are being used, find out which type, understand the implications of using that refrigerant over the long term and if using more environmentally benign alternatives is possible. Phasing out HCFCs is not covered by EAp3, but it will help in achieving EAc4: Enhanced Refrigerant Management, which is often worth pursuing.     


  • If your project is purchasing new HVAC&R equipment, you'll automatically meet this prerequisite. The Montreal Protocol treaty mandated a complete phase out of CFC-based refrigerants by 1995, and HCFCs by 2030 in developed countries. As a result, compliant, environmentally preferable refrigerants are the only option available for new systems. 


  • This prerequisite applies to all space conditioning and refrigeration systems included in the LEED scope of work, including:

    • chillers;
    • unitary HVAC equipment (split and packaged);
    • room and window air-conditioners;
    • computer, data center, and telecom room-cooling units;
    • and commercial refrigeration equipment.

  • The prerequisite does not, however, apply to small units and other types of equipment, such as refrigerators and small water coolers that contain less than 0.5 pounds of refrigerant. 


  • For existing buildings, equipment installed before 1995 potentially contains CFCs. Check the specifications on the manufacturer’s website to be sure existing equipment does not contain CFCs. 


  • If existing equipment uses CFCs and will be retained, prepare a phase-out plan for conversion to an appropriate CFC-free refrigerant or a plan for equipment replacement. 

    • Conversion: Your conversion plan should include specifications for the current system, with current and proposed refrigerant types and a firm timetable for refrigerant replacement. The plan should be developed by your mechanical engineer in collaboration with the tenant or owner, printed on official letterhead, and signed by the appropriate facilities or operations manager. 
    • Replacement: Your replacement plan should include specifications for the new system and a firm timetable for system replacement, as well as designation of your proposed system and preferred, system-specific refrigerant. 

  • If your building is connected to a district cooling system, the chillers in that system, even if outside your project's scope or control, should be CFC-free. If they are not, commit to a plan for phase-out of the refrigerant or replacement of the system equipment within five years of project completion.


  • If your project is connected to a district cooling system and you want to show that a CFC phase-out is not economically feasible, engage a qualified, independent third party to prepare an analysis demonstrating that both conversion and replacement will have a net ten-year cost. This is determined by a simple payback calculation that subtracts the ten-year cost savings (from energy and maintenance savings) from the cost of the system replacement or conversion. If the number is zero or negative, this represents a cost after the ten-year period and the system will be considered not economically feasible.


  • If existing systems with CFCs need to be phased out, there could be a considerable first cost in converting existing systems or purchasing new equipment. However, your first cost will almost always be justified by longer-term energy and maintenance cost savings. 

Schematic Design

Expand All

  • Consider attempting EAc4: Enhanced Refrigerant Management, which is attainable for many projects. Rather than simply avoiding a specific set of chemicals, EAc4 requires you to run calculations on your refrigerant selection that factor in leakage rates and coolant charge, as well as ozone depletion potential (ODP) and global warming potential (GWP).

Design Development

Expand All

  • Confirm that the selection of refrigerant in your project’s HVAC&R systems is CFC-free. 


  • For existing buildings, confirm that the phase-out plan has been completed and preparations are being made for the installation of new equipment or for the conversion to a non-CFC refrigerant in existing systems before the project completion date. 


  • For existing buildings that are choosing to demonstrate that the phase-out doesn’t meet the 10-year payback requirement, review and confirm the calculations of the third-party consultant that has provided them to ensure that all potential savings are included, from energy (with demand charges) and maintenance.

Construction Documents

Expand All

  • Complete your documentation through LEED Online by providing the HVAC&R equipment type, manufacturer, model number, installation date, and refrigerant used; state whether the equipment is for the LEED project only or from a central plant. 


  • Specify high-quality equipment with a dependably long lifespan. That way leakage is minimized at those times that carry the greatest risks; when the equipment is being installed or decommissioned. (For information about the service life of different types of HVAC equipment, see the 2007 ASHRAE Applications Handbook—HVAC Applications. See Resources.)

Construction

Expand All

  • Keep HVAC&R equipment cut sheets on file in the case that there is an urgent problem with the refrigerant in the equipment so that the refrigerant can be handled or replaced properly. 

Operations & Maintenance

Expand All

  • If phasing CFCs out of an existing system, follow through on your commitment to do so within five years. 


  • Refrigerants are not harmful to the environment until they are released into it. That’s most likely to occur during installation, maintenance, and removal. Hire a contractor that uses best-practice refrigerant management techniques to minimize leakage rates during operations and when installing new or removing old equipment.  

  • USGBC

    Excerpted from LEED 2009 for Core and Shell Development

    EA Prerequisite 3: Fundamental refrigerant management

    Required

    Intent

    To reduce stratospheric ozone depletion.

    Requirements

    Zero use of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-based refrigerants in new base building heating, ventilating, air conditioning and refrigeration (HVAC&R) systems. When reusing existing base building HVAC equipment, complete a comprehensive CFC phase-out conversion prior to project completion. Phase-out plans extending beyond the project completion date will be considered on their merits.

    Existing small HVAC units (defined as containing less than 0.5 pounds (228 grams) of refrigerant) and other equipment, such as standard refrigerators, small water coolers and any other equipment that contains less than 0.5 pounds (228 grams) of refrigerant, are not considered part of the base building system and are not subject to the requirements of this prerequisite.

    Potential Technologies & Strategies

    When reusing existing HVAC systems, conduct an inventory to identify equipment that uses CFC-based refrigerants and provide a replacement schedule for these refrigerants. For new buildings, specify new HVAC equipment in the base building that uses no CFC-based refrigerants.

Organizations

US EPA Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP)

SNAP is an EPA program to identify alternatives to ozone-depleting substances. The program maintains up-to-date lists of environmentally friendly substitutes for refrigeration and air-conditioning equipment, solvents, fire-suppression systems, adhesives, coatings, and other substances.

Publications

2007 ASHRAE Applications Handbook – HVAC Applications

To determine the service life of a piece of HVAC equipment.


Refrigerant Conversion Table

If you’re considering a conversion, this chart shows typical refrigerants types and conversion recommendations.

Web Tools

Atmospheric Life of Refrigerant

The table ranks commonly used refrigerants based on their life in the atmosphere which increases the GWP.

Articles

Green Fire Suppression Technologies

Article describing the movement towards Halon free chemicals with a comparative analysis.

Refrigerant Management Calculator

Use this refrigerant management calculator to track and document your compliance with EAp3 and EAc4. You may also use the LEED Online credit form to document compliance, but that form has a finite number of rows, whereas this one can be expanded indefinitely. If you choose to use this calculator, add a narrative in LEED Online about using a supplemental calculator to complete calculations, and upload the document on LEED Online.

LEED Online Forms: CS-2009 EA

The following links take you to the public, informational versions of the dynamic LEED Online forms for each CS-2009 EA credit. You'll need to fill out the live versions of these forms on LEED
Online
for each credit you hope to earn.

These links are posted by LEEDuser with USGBC's permission. USGBC has certain usage restrictsions for these forms; for more information, visit LEED Online and click "Sample Forms Download."

The following links take you to the public, informational versions of the dynamic LEED Online forms for each CS-2009 EA credit. You'll need to fill out the live versions of these forms on LEED
Online
for each credit you hope to earn.

These links are posted by LEEDuser with USGBC's permission. USGBC has certain usage restrictsions for these forms; for more information, visit LEED Online and click "Sample Forms Download."

Design Submittal

PencilDocumentation for this credit can be part of a Design Phase submittal.

11 Comments

0
0
Mathilda Jonsson Environmental Certification Engineer
Apr 04 2013
LEEDuser Member
425 Thumbs Up

Commercial kitchen cooling equipment

There are no refrigerants used in my project building for the HVAC&R-system. But we have the commercial kitchen cooling system (refrigerator and that kind of equipment that will be using R134a and R404A. Should I include these system in EAp3 and EAc4 or are they excluded?

Post a Reply
0
0
Jorng-ren Chern CEO Enertek Sustainable Design & Technology
Mar 13 2013
LEEDuser Member
503 Thumbs Up

Deal with leasing agreement?

I am working on a residential project and tenant units would be sold without interior. We submitted design review and the review commented requested to provide sales agreement. The project owner plans to start selling the project so complete lease agreement is not ready until six months later.

I wonder if we can submit LEED requirements which will be stated in the sales agreement instead of whole sales agreement for complying the requirement? Will the GBCI accept if we provide a section of sales agreement instead of whole agreement?

1
1
0
Tristan Roberts LEED AP BD+C, Editorial Director – LEEDuser, BuildingGreen, Inc. Mar 21 2013 LEEDuser Moderator

It seems to me that this should be allowed.

Post a Reply
0
0
Tony Schafer
Aug 23 2012
Guest
158 Thumbs Up

Completing EAp3 Form Without Equipment Information

I am having trouble completing the EAp3 form. Since there won't be any cooling equipmentThe equipment used for cooling room air in a building for human comfort. installed as part of this C&S project, there is nothing to fill out in table L-2. Compliance will be shown on the lease agreement, which I have uploaded to the credit form. However, even with the lease agreement uploaded, the form is still showing an "N" for compliance. Since I do not have any information to enter in the form, how do I get around this and complete the form to show a "Y"? Or can I just submit as-is with the lease agreement uploaded and showing "N" with and explanation under special circumstances? Can a project even be submitted with prerequisites showing "N"? Would appreciate any help you can provide. Thanks

1
1
0
Ante Vulin Sustainability Manager, YR&G Aug 24 2012 LEEDuser Expert 353 Thumbs Up

Did you enter the page relevant page numbers? That may be the last step. But if you have already tried that, yes, you can submit a project with a prerequisite showing "N". While it's important to complete all documentation, including the credit form, ultimately the supporting documentation can supplement this.

Or you can check the "The project team is using an alternative compliance approach in lieu of standard submittal paths." box, explain the credit form issues, and then make sure you include all relevant supporting documentation. That should change you from an "N" to a "Y".

Post a Reply
0
0
Curt Pascoe P.E., LEED AP BD+C Ryan Companies US, Inc.
Mar 20 2012
LEEDuser Member
725 Thumbs Up

Future HVAC Installation

What if your CS building scope does not include HVAC equipment (and therefore no refrigerants)? USGBC requires the entire building to meet this prereq (including tenant spaces). I am not concerned about meeting it in the future, but I wonder how you prove to the USGBC that it will be met. A Tenant/Sales Agreement is only viable if there is a tenant - what can you provide in the case of a speculative building? Will the GBCI accept a notarized letter or other options?

1
1
0
Ante Vulin Sustainability Manager, YR&G Jun 21 2012 LEEDuser Expert 353 Thumbs Up

Curt, we have repeatedly documented credits for CS buildings by providing a copy of a typical lease for the building, even if there was no tenant yet. In this case the typical lease language would need to include a no CFC clause. This clause shouldn't be a problem for any future tenant, since presumably they would be purchasing new, non-CFC-using equipment.

Post a Reply
0
0
John Chyz Commissioning Authority The Cross Creek Initiative, Inc.
Dec 03 2010
Guest
224 Thumbs Up

R-22

Is R-22 compliant with the requirements of EAp3?

1
3
0
Scott DeGaro Sustainability Administrator, Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc. Dec 03 2010 Guest 379 Thumbs Up

HCFC-22 is compliant with the prerequisite. However, as of January 1, 2010 manufacturers were no longer allowed to produce equipment containing HCFC-22. That doesn't mean they can't (and don't) still manufacture equipment that operates on R-22, but is uncharged when it's delivered to the site.

Are you wondering from a new equipment purchase or an existing system?

This EPA site has some good timeline information: http://www.epa.gov/ozone/title6/phaseout/22phaseout.html

2
3
0
John Chyz Commissioning Authority, The Cross Creek Initiative, Inc. Dec 05 2010 Guest 224 Thumbs Up

Thank you for the rapid response. We are constructing a new core and shell on healthcare campus that is served by an existing chiller plant. USGBC district energy guidelines stipulate that all chillers must meet EAp3 requirements. 2 chillers currently use 134a, 2 use R-22 and one uses HCFC 123. It is my understanding that HCFC 123 is not compliant and will require a phase out plan - is this corrrect? Also, can we simply demonstrate that the compliant chillers serve our building exclusively or do we need to ensure that the entire plant meets EAp3 requirements? Thank you for you input.

3
3
0
Scott DeGaro Sustainability Administrator, Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon, Inc. Dec 06 2010 Guest 379 Thumbs Up

EAp3 only excludes the use of CFC-based refrigerants. R-22 (HCFC), R-123 (HCFC) and R-134a (HFC) are all compliant with the prerequisite, because they are all non-CFC based refrigerants. Therefore you don’t need to worry about a phase-out plan.

Where you may run into an issue is if you’re also pursuing EAc4 – Enhanced Refrigerant Management. R-22 has the highest Global Warming Potential (GWP) and Ozone Depleting Potential (ODP) of those 3 refrigerants and you’re total impact per ton may exceed the allowable limit.

I hope that helps.

Post a Reply

Start a new LEED comment thread

May 21 2013
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Copyright 2013 – BuildingGreen, Inc.