EBOM 2009 IEQc1.3: IAQ Best Management Practices—Increased Ventilation

  • EBOM_IEQc1-3_Type3-Ventilation Diagram
  • You may have already earned this credit

    You already addressed this credit as part of the compliance process for IEQp1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance. If the measurements you took for IEQp1 indicate that your building has ventilation rates that are at least 30% better than ASHRAE 62.1-2007 for every ventilation distribution system, no further action is required, other than checking that any needed documentation is uploaded.

    If, on the other hand, your ventilation rates are not at least 30% better than ASHRAE 62.1-2007, you’ll need to consider whether it is appropriate to pursue this credit.

    Pros and cons to more fresh air

    If you need to increase ventilation rates throughout the building to reach the 30% threshold, you will also be increasing your HVAC energy consumption and...

Step-by-step credit help

Got the gist of the LEED credit but not sure how to actually achieve it? LEEDuser gives step-by-step help. Members get:

  • Checklists covering all the key action steps you'll need to earn the credit.
  • Hot tips to give you shortcuts and avoid pitfalls.
  • Cost tips to assess what a credit will actually cost, and how to make it affordable.
  • Ideas for going beyond LEED with best practices.
  • All checklists organized by project phase.
  • On-the-fly suggestions on useful items from the Documentation Toolkit, Resources, and Credit Language.


  • Credit language straight from USGBC

    Need to check up on the exact LEED credit language from the LEED Rating System on the fly? LEEDuser includes the verbatim language. Members get:

    • Easy access to the official LEED credit language with just a couple of clicks.
    • On the jobsite without your bulky LEED Reference Guide? Check up on the credit language details here.
    • Credit language content is used by permission of the U.S. Green Building Council.


Your credit-by-credit reference library

Why waste time chasing down referenced standards and supporting resources when LEEDuser links you directly to the ones you need? LEEDuser has gathered all the best tools out there and organized them by credit for easy reference. Members get links to:

  • Organizations that can give information or help on a credit.
  • Standards or studies that are key reference points for credits and prerequisites.
  • Articles that help explain important topics.
  • Key documents or references for credit inputs.
  • Software tools you can use to run calculations or simulations.


Documentation Toolkit

In the end, LEED is all about documentation. LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit saves you time and helps you avoid mistakes with:

  • Calculators to help assess credit compliance.
  • Tracking spreadsheets for materials purchases.
  • Spreadsheets and forms to give to subs and other team members.
  • Guidance documents on arcane LEED issues.
  • Sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions.
  • Examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects.


4 Comments

0
0
Richard Navarro
Jan 13 2011
Member
345 Thumbs Up

ASHRAE 62 Calcs

I input information into their Online spreadsheet, but the numbers didn't seem to match with what our Engineer has as constants for the spaces when the ASHRAE 62 Audit was done. Also some spaces are not defined in LEED Online spreadsheets that our Engineer has in the calculations.

We talked to our Engineer and he said our numbers are more accurate than what LEED Online has.

I tried submitting the open spreadsheet to LEED because we were told by a representative on the phone that this would be acceptable.

We submitted the project, but they wrote in their comments that we need to input the information into their Online Spreadsheet. It seems that there is some sort of disconnect with what is acceptable and what isn't.

Any advice on what I should do upon re-submission?

1
1
0
Dan Ackerstein Principal, Ackerstein Sustainability, LLC Jan 21 2011 Guest Expert 2854 Thumbs Up

Richard - You might check out the comment I just posted to EQp1 on this issue but you're in a tight spot with a disconnect between the 62MZCalculator and the LOL table. It sounds like you submitted the 62MZCalculators but did not populate the table because for some reason the table generates a different outcome than the calculator. I think your best bet for resubmittal is to a) double-check the heck out of your calculations to be sure that your 62MZCalculator is right and the LOL table is wrong, and then, assuming that is indeed the case, b) complete the table and provide a detailed explanation as to why the table misrepresents your situation but the 62MZCalc accurately illustrates compliance with the standard. Like I said, its a tough spot to be in during a final review, but I think that ultimately the reviewer can be educated as to your situation and why the calculations don't match.

Hope that helps.

Log In to Reply
0
0
Daniel Whittet Green Building Consultant A|H|A Consulting Engineers
Jun 24 2010
Member
14 Thumbs Up

Mechanical ventilation systems with operable windows

What if my mechanical ventilation was sufficient to meet ASHRAE 62.1 minimums AND the majority of my rooms had operable windows? Could I use the operable windows to meet the 30% additional ventilation for 90% of spaces?

1
1
0
Tristan Roberts Editorial Director – LEEDuser, BuildingGreen, Inc. Jan 20 2011 Moderator

Daniel, I think this would be theoreticaly possible, but fraught with some difficulties. A key one is that your HVAC system is probably designed to operate independently of operable windows, and vice versa. To do what you propose you really need to make sure that they'll play nice together and actually deliver the 30% difference. This may take some complicated work. And is that really how the system will be used?

Log In to Reply

Copyright 2012 – BuildingGreen, Inc.