NC-2009 EAp2: Minimum Energy Performance

  • NC EAp2 Credit Req's Diagram
  • Check updated requirements

    USGBC's membership approved an update to LEED 2009 effective April 8, 2016. The update only affects LEED 2009 projects registered on or after that date.

    Project teams will be required to earn a minimum of four points in EAc1, effectively making EAp2 more stringent. The referenced energy standard and modeling requirements are not changed. Buildings falling under the proposed change can use the same methodologies and referenced standards, but will need to earn additional points in order to achieve certification. 

    The intent of the change is to bring LEED 2009 energy requirements more up to date, as LEED 2009 continues to be the predominant LEED rating system, even though the more up-to-date LEED v4 has also become available.

    Beyond code compliance, but doable

    This prerequisite is a big one, not only because it’s required for all projects, but also because it feeds directly into EAc1: Optimize Energy Performance, where about a fifth of the total available points in LEED are at stake. Master these minimum requirements, and you can use the same compliance path as in EAp2 to earning points.

    You won’t earn the prerequisite by accident, though. Although “energy efficiency” is on everyone’s lips, the mandatory and performance-based requirements for EAp2 go beyond code compliance in most places. That said, there is nothing to stop you from meeting the requirements with a reasonable amount of effort, and the environmental benefits as well as the operational cost savings are significant.

    Most projects start by choosing which of the three available compliance paths to follow. We’ll look at them each in turn.

    Option 1: Energy modeling

    Option 1 alone gives you access to all of the points available through EAc1, and offers the most flexibility in giving you credit for innovative designs.

    First, you need to meet the mandatory requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2007 for all major components, including the envelope, HVAC, lighting, and domestic hot water. ASHRAE 90.1 has had some changes and new mandatory requirements since the 2004 version, which was referenced on previous LEED systems, so be sure to review the standard carefully.

    Cost of changeEnergy efficiency is an area where it behooves project teams to start early and work together to maximize savings. Playing catch-up later on can be costly.Second, you need to demonstrate a 10% savings (5% for existing buildings) for your designed building compared with a baseline case meeting the minimum requirements of ASHRAE 90.1 (or Title 24-2005, Part 6 for California projects). You do this by creating a computer model following rules described in Appendix G of ASHRAE 90.1.

    Computer modeling offers the following key advantages:

    • It can be used to provide feedback on your design both early on, and as the design progresses, so it’s best to use in this way rather than simply demonstrating compliance.
    • It can help your team focus on the most cost-effective efficiency strategies, by plugging in different options and seeing the results.
    • If your building is unconventional or complex in design, an energy model is the best way to account for that.

    Your building type may not have a choice—you may have to follow this path, because both Options 2 and 3 are prescriptive compliance paths that are only available to specific building types and sizes.

    However, if your building type and size allow, and you don’t want to embark on the complex process of computer modeling, which also requires expert assistance from a modeler or from a member of the mechanical engineer’s team, the prescriptive compliance paths are a good way to earn the prerequisite simply by following a checklist.

    Solar shadingPassive design strategies such as shading to reduce solar heat gain are the most cost-effective ways to improve energy performance.Note, however, that when you get to EAc1, there are a lot fewer points on the table for the prescriptive paths, and that you have to follow each prescriptive requirement. These paths also require more collaboration and focus early on in design than you might think. The design team must work together to integrate all of the prescriptive requirements, and Option 3 even requires documentation of certain design processes.

    Option 2: ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides

    The Advanced Energy Design Guides are published by ASHRAE for office, warehouse, and retail projects less than 20,000 ft2—so if you don’t fall into one of those categories, you’re not eligible for this path.

    These guides outline strategies to reduce energy use by 30% from 2001 levels, or an amount equivalent to approximately 10%–14% reduction from ASHRAE 90.1-2007. If you choose this compliance path, become familiar with the list of prescriptive requirements and commit to meeting all of them.

    Option 3: Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide

    The Core Performance Guide path is a good option if all of the following are true:

    • your project is smaller than 100,000 ft2,
    • you cannot pursue Option 2 because there is not an ASHRAE guide for the building type,
    • your project is not a healthcare facility, lab, or warehouse,
    • and you would rather not commit to the energy modeling required for Option 1.

    Comply with all requirements within Sections 1 and 2 of the guide. If you choose this path, become familiar with the list of prescriptive requirements and commit to meeting them. Also note that it’s not just a list of prescriptive requirements, but a prescribed process for achieving energy efficiency goals. You must demonstrate that you considered a couple of alternate designs, for example, and that certain team meetings were held.

    Reduce energy loads first

    Energy efficiency offers a clear combination of environmental benefit and benefit to the owner through reduced operational expenses, and potentially reduced first costs, if you’re able to reduce the size and complexity of your HVAC system with a more efficient envelope.

    High-tech HVAC systems, and onsite renewable energy generation are often signature components of green buildings, but consider these strategies more “icing” on the cake, rather than a place to start. Start with building orientation and passive design features first. Also look at envelope design, such as energy-efficient windows, walls and roof, before looking at HVAC and plug loads. A poorly designed envelope with a high-tech HVAC system is not, on the whole, efficient or cost-effective. 

    District energy systems

    Projects connected to district energy systems will not be able to utilize the system efficiencies of the base plant to demonstrate compliance with the prerequisite. They can plan on benefiting from these systems under EAc1, however.

    Look for incentives

    Focusing on energy efficiency and renewable energy generation can seem to add costs to a project, but there are a variety of utility-provided, as well as state, and federal incentives available to offset those premiums. (See Resources.)

  • FAQs for EAp2

    Is it acceptable to model a split-type AC with inverter technology compressor as a heat pump, like modeling VRF?

    Ideally if the software you are using cannot model a technology directly then seek a published workaround related to your software. If you can't find a published workaround then model it as you think it should be modeled and explain how you have modeled it in the preliminary LEED submission.

    A portion of our building envelope is historic. Can we exclude it from our model?

    No, not if it is part of the LEED project. However, there is an exemption for existing building envelopes in Appendix G that allow you to model the existing condition in the baseline so you do not pay a penalty.

    For an existing building, do I need to rotate the model?

    No, not for an existing building.

    Our project has a large process load—75%. Despite our efforts to make an efficient HVAC design, the cost savings are minimal. What can we do to earn this prerequisite and be eligible for LEED certification? Is there any flexibility in how we model the process load?

    You must model accurately. Since you don't have enough savings in the building energy, find savings in the process. Either you will be able to demonstrate that compared to a conventional baseline the process being installed into the factory is demonstrably better than "similar newly constructed facilities," allowing you to claim some savings, or the owner needs to install some energy-saving measures into the process to get the project the rest of the way there. Either option can be difficult, but not impossible.

    Account for process load reductions through the exceptional calculation method. A baseline must be established based on standard practice for the process in your location. Any claim of energy savings needs a thorough narrative explaining the baseline and the strategy for energy savings along with an explanation of how the savings were calculated.

    Our process load is higher than 25%. Do we have to justify that?

    It is common to have a 80%–90% process load in a manufacturing facility. The 25% default in LEED is based on office buildings. If you think your load is lower than 25%, it is recommended that you explain why in a short narrative. It is also recommended to briefly explain it if your load is 25% exactly, since that level commonly reveals that the process loads were not accurately represented.

    Do the required savings for this prerequisite (and credit) need to come only from building energy, or also process loads?

    The energy savings are based on the whole building energy use—building and process. LEED does not stipulate exactly where they come from.

    Our local code references ASHRAE 90.1-2010. Should I use that for my documentation, or 90.1-2007?

    For LEED 2009 you'll need touse 90.1-2007. There were some significant changes in 90.1-2010—too many to account for in your LEED review, and your project would also have a much harder time demonstrating the same percentage energy savings.

    Our project doesn't have enough energy savings to earn the prerequisite. Can we get there by incorporating onsite renewables?

    Yes according to LEED, although it is not recommended as a best practice, and it is usually more cost-effective to invest in energy savings in the building.

    Can I claim exterior lighting savings for canopy lighting even though a baseline model cannot include shading elements?

    You can assume exterior lighting savings for canopies against the baseline, but not the shading effects of canopies.

    The project is built on a site with existing exterior lighting installed. How should this be accounted for?

    If exterior lighting is present on the project site, consider it as a constant in both energy model cases.

    Can mezzanines open to floors below be excluded from the energy model?

    Any conditioned area must be included in the energy model.

    How do I provide a zip code for an international location?

    The Energy Star portion of the form does not apply to international projects.

    For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the climate zone?

    Use the tables and definitions provided in 90.1 Appendix B to determine an equivalent ASHRAE climate zone.

    For a project outside the U.S., how do I determine the Target Finder score?

    International projects are not required to enter a Target Finder score. Target Finder is based on U.S. energy use data.

    Do hotel rooms need automatic light shut-off control?

    For Section 9.4.1.1c, a manual control device would be sufficient to comply with mandatory provisions.

    How commonly are the 90.1 mandatory compliance forms submitted as part of EAp2/EAc1?

    Submitting these forms is not common; however, it can be beneficial if you are applying for any exceptions.

    The Section 9 space-by-space method does not include residential space types. What should I use?

    Use the building area method.

    Can the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) be used to energy model for LEED?

    Although there is no formal list of approved simulation tools, there are a few requirements per G2.2.1, including the ability of the program to provide hourly simulation for 8760 hours per year, and model ten or more thermal zones, which PHPP does not meet.

    Can the Trace 700 'LEED Energy Performance Summary Report' by uploaded to LEED Online in lieu of the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet?

    The automated Trace 700 report provides less information than is requested by the Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet. The Section 1.4 tables spreadsheet must be completed.

    Which baseline HVAC system do I use if my building has no heating or air conditioning?

    Assign HVAC systems as per Appendix-G and Section 6 but set thermostatic setpointsSetpoints are normal operating ranges for building systems and indoor environmental quality. When the building systems are outside of their normal operating range, action is taken by the building operator or automation system. out of range so that systems never turn on.

    Our project has a diesel backup generator. Should we include it in our energy model?

    If it is only used for backup and not for regular use such as peak shaving—no.

    Can SHGC be higher in the proposed than in the baseline model?

    SHGC is not a mandatory provision so it is available for trade-off and can be higher than the baseline.

    Do I need to justify the electrical and fuel rates I am using in my model?

    You generally wouldn't need to upload any documentation, but particularly for a non-U.S. project, it may help to provide a short narrative about what they are based on.

Legend

  • Best Practices
  • Gotcha
  • Action Steps
  • Cost Tip

Pre-Design

Expand All

  • Discuss your project’s energy performance objectives, along with how those are shaping design decisions, with the owner. Record energy targets in the Owners Project Requirements (OPR) for the commissioning credits EAp1 and EAc3


  • You won’t earn this prerequisite by accident. The energy efficiency requirements here are typically much more stringent than local codes, so plan on giving it special attention with your team, including leadership from the owner. 


  • Consider stating goals in terms of minimum efficiency levels and specific payback periods. For example: “Our goal is to exceed a 20% reduction from ASHRAE 90.1, with all efficiency measures having a payback period of 10 years or less.”


  • Develop a precedent for energy targets by conducting research on similar building types and using the EPA’s Target Finder program. (See Resources.)


  • For Option 1 only, you will need to comply with the mandatory requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2007, to bring your project to the minimum level of performance. The ASHRAE 90.1-2007 User’s Manual is a great resource, with illustrated examples of solutions for meeting the requirements.


  • ASHRAE 90.1-2007 has some additional requirements compared with 2004. Read through the standard for a complete update. The following are some samples. 

    • All exterior walls must be installed with rigid insulation of the spans across all floors. This can be accomplished by placing the insulation outside the air barrier. 
    • All exterior doors must be tested for maximum air leakage rate. 
    • All spaces must have independent lighting controls. 
    • Occupancy sensors must be installed in some spaces.
    • The minimum efficiency level of specific mechanical equipment has been raised.  

  • The prerequisite’s energy-reduction target of 10% is not common practice and is considered beyond code compliance. 


  • ClerestoryIndirect sunlight delievered through clerestories like this helps reduce lighting loads as well as cooling loads. Photo – YRG Sustainability, Project – Cooper Union, New York A poorly designed envelope with a high-tech HVAC system is not, on the whole, efficient or cost-effective. Start with building orientation and passive design features first when looking for energy efficiency. Also look at envelope design, such as energy-efficient windows, walls and roof, before looking at HVAC and plug loads. HVAC may also be a good place to improve performance with more efficient equipment, but first reducing loads with smaller equipment can lead to even greater operational and upfront savings. A poorly designed envelope with a high-tech HVAC system is not, on the whole, efficient or cost-effective. 


  • Don’t plan on using onsite renewable energy generation (see EAc2) to make your building energy-efficient. It is almost always more cost-effective to make an efficient building, and then to add renewables like photovoltaics as the “icing” on the cake.


  • Some rules of thumb to reduce energy use are:

    • Program similar spaces together to reduce distribution losses 
    • Use a window-to-wall ratio below 40%, on average
    • Use a window-to-wall ratio below 20% on east and west sides, to reduce low-angle solar gain, and glare; 
    • Reduce direct solar gain with solar shades or building geometry and orientation
    • Distribute heating and cooling loads uniformly throughout all facades for a smaller system size. 
    • Design a tight and well-insulated building envelope to reduce the heating load and improve HVAC performance
    • Use right-sized and efficient heating and cooling systems
    • Consider onsite renewable energy generation.

  • Choosing your compliance path


  • Find the best credit compliance path based on your building type and energy-efficiency targets. Use the following considerations, noting that some projects are more suited to a prescriptive approach than others. 


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation requires estimating the energy use of the whole building over a calendar year, using methodology established by ASHRAE 90.1-2007, Appendix G. Option 1 establishes a computer model of the building’s architectural design and all mechanical, electrical, domestic hot water, plug load, and other energy-consuming systems and devices. The model incorporates the occupancy load and a schedule representing projected usage in order to predict energy use. This compliance path does not prescribe any technology or strategy, but requires a minimum reduction in total energy cost of 10% (5% for an existing building), compared to a baseline building with the same form and design but using systems compliant with ASHRAE 90.1-2007. You can earn additional LEED points through EAc1 for cost reductions of 12% and greater (8% for existing buildings). 


  • Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path: ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide refers to design guides published by ASHRAE for office, school, warehouse, and retail projects. These guides outline strategies to reduce energy use by 30% from ASHRAE 90.1-2001 levels, or an amount equivalent to a 10%–14% reduction from the ASHRAE 90.1-2007 standard. If you choose this compliance path, become familiar with the list of prescriptive requirements and commit to meeting them. (See the AEDG checklist in the Documentation Toolkit.) 


  • Option 3: Prescriptive Compliance Path: Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide is another, more basic prescriptive path. It’s a good option if your project is smaller than 100,000 ft2, cannot pursue Option 2 (because there is not an ASHRAE guide for the building type), is not a healthcare facility, lab, or warehouse—or you would rather not commit to the energy modeling required for Option 1. Your project can be of any other building type (such as office or retail). To meet the prerequisite, you must comply with all requirements within Sections 1 and 2 of the guide. If you choose this path, become familiar with the list of activities and requirements and commit to meeting them. (See Resources for a link to the Core Performance Guide and the Documentation Toolkit for the checklist of prescriptive items.)


  • EAc1: Optimize Energy Performance uses the same structure of Options 1–3, so it makes sense to think about the credit and the prerequisite together when making your choice. In EAc1, Option 1 offers the potential for far more points than Options 2 and 3, so if you see your project as a likely candidate for earning those points, Option 1 may be best.


  • Hotels, multifamily residential, and unconventional commercial buildings may not be eligible for either Option 2 or Option 3, because the prescriptive guidance of these paths was not intended for them. Complex projects, unconventional building types, off-grid projects, or those with high energy-reduction goals are better off pursuing Option 1, which provides the opportunity to explore more flexible and innovative efficiency strategies and to trade off high-energy uses for lower ones. 


  • If your project combines new construction and existing building renovation then whatever portion contains more than 50% of the floor area would determine the energy thresholds.


  • Options 2 and 3 are suitable for small, conventional building types that may not have as much to gain from detailed energy modeling with Option 1. 


  • Meeting the prescriptive requirements of Options 2 and 3 is not common practice and requires a high degree of attention to detail by your project team. (See the Documentation Toolkit for the Core Performance Guide Checklist.) These paths are more straightforward than Option 1, but don’t think of them as easy. 


  • Options 2 and 3 require additional consultant time from architects and MEP engineers over typical design commitment, which means higher upfront costs. 


  • Option 1 references the mandatory requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2007, which are more stringent than earlier LEED rating systems that referred to ASHRAE 90.1-2004.


  • Option 1 energy simulation provides monthly and annual operating energy use and cost breakdowns. You can complete multiple iterations, refining energy-efficiency strategies each time. Payback periods can be quickly computed for efficiency strategies using their additional first costs. A building’s life is assumed to be 60 years. A payback period of five years is considered a very good choice, and 10 years is typically considered reasonable. Consult the OPR for your owners’ goals while selecting your efficiency strategies. 


  • Option 1 energy simulation often requires hiring an energy modeling consultant, adding a cost (although this ranges, it is typically on the order of $0.10–$0.50/ft2 depending on the complexity). However, these fees produce high value in terms of design and decision-making assistance, and especially for complex or larger projects can be well worth the investment. 


  • All compliance path options may require both the architectural and engineering teams to take some time in addition to project management to review the prescriptive checklists, fill out the LEED Online credit form, and develop the compliance document. 


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation


  • The architect, mechanical engineer, and lighting designer need to familiarize themselves and confirm compliance with the mandatory requirements of ASHRAE 90.1-2007, sections 5–9.


  • Use simple computer tools like SketchUp and Green Building Studio that are now available with energy analysis plug-ins to generate a first-order estimate of building energy use within a climate context and to identify a design direction. Note that you may need to refer to different software may not be the one used to develop complete the whole building energy simulations necessary for LEED certification. 


  • Energy modeling can inform your project team from the start of design. Early on, review site climate data—such as temperature, humidity and wind, available from most energy software—as a team. Evaluate the site context and the microclimate, noting the effects of neighboring buildings, bodies of water, and vegetation. Estimate the distribution of energy across major end uses (such as space heating and cooling, lighting, plug loads, hot water, and any additional energy uses), targeting high-energy-use areas to focus on during design.  


  • Energy use breakdown pie chartUse a preliminary energy use breakdown like this one to identify target areas for energy savings.Perform preliminary energy modeling in advance of the schematic design phase kick-off meeting or design charrette. The energy use breakdown can help identify targets for energy savings and point toward possible alternatives. 


  • For existing buildings, the baseline energy model can reflect the pre-renovation features like rather than a minimally ASHRAE-compliant building. This will help you achieve additional savings in comparison with the baseline.


  • Projects generating renewable energy onsite should use Option 1 to best demonstrate EAp2 compliance and maximize points under EAc1. Other options are possible but won’t provide as much benefit. Like any other project, model the baseline case as a system compliant with ASHRAE 90.1-2007, using grid-connected electricity, and the design case is an “as-designed” system also using grid-connected electricity. You then plug in 100% onsite renewable energy in the final energy-cost comparison table, as required by the performance rating method (PRM) or the modeling protocol of ASHRRAE 90.1 2007, Appendix G. (Refer to the sample PRM tables in the Documentation Toolkit for taking account of onsite renewable energy.


  • LEED divides energy-using systems into two categories: 

    • (i) Regulated loads. Most prominent systems—space heating, cooling, ventilation and pumps, lighting, and hot water—are regulated by ASHRAE and LEED so are termed “regulated” loads. Your energy model can provide insights into the energy use of all these systems. 
    • (ii) Non-regulated loads are those which are not directly associated with creating a comfortable environment, but with plug loads for machines. These include elevators, kitchen equipment, office equipment, televisions, and activity-oriented lighting, such as in hospitals. Though these are very large energy loads, they are not regulated by ASHRAE 90.1 or by LEED. Energy savings from specifying better equipment is not counted in energy models. It is typically expected that these non-regulated loads contribute to 25% of energy use.

  • The energy model itself will not account for any change in plug loads from the baseline case, even if your project is making a conscious effort to purchase Energy Star or other efficient equipment. Any improvement made in plug loads must be documented separately, using the exceptional calculation methodology (ECM), as described in ASHRAE 90.1-2007. These calculations determine the design case energy cost compared to the baseline case. They are included in the performance rating method (PRM) table or directly in the baseline and design case model. 


  • Besides energy modeling, you may need to use the exceptional calculation methodology (ECM) when any of the following situations occur: 

    • The energy software cannot carry out calculations for a specific systems like natural ventilation or unusual HVAC equipment.
    • Process loads are different in baseline and design cases and can influence total energy cost savings.
    • The proposed design can’t demonstrate savings with the modeling protocol and needs additional calculations. 

  • Some energy-modeling software tools have a daylight-modeling capability. Using the same model for both energy and IEQc8.1: Daylight and Views—Daylight can greatly reduce the cost of your modeling efforts.


  • Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path—ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides


  • Provide a copy of the AEDG for office, retail, or warehouse, as applicable, to each team member as everyone, including the architect, mechanical and electrical engineers, lighting designer, and commissioning agents, are responsible for ensuring compliance. These are available to download free from the ASHRAE website. (See Resources.) 


  • Find your climate zone before attempting to meet any detailed prescriptive requirements. Climate zones vary by county, so be sure to select the right one. (See the Documentation Toolkit for a list of climate zones by county.)


  • Develop a checklist of all requirements, and assign responsible team members to accomplish them. Hold a meeting to walk the team through the AEDG checklist for your project’s climate zone. Clarify specific design goals and prescriptive requirements in the OPR for EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning.


  • Early access to the AEDG by each team member avoids last-minute changes that can have cascading, and costly, effects across many building systems. 


  • The AEDG prescriptive requirements include: 

    • a maximum allowable window-to-wall ratio;
    • continuous insulation on the outside of walls;
    • roofs and floor-slab minimum thermal performance;
    • minimum window and door thermal performance;
    • minimum boiler and chiller efficiencies;
    • and mandatory use economizers or heat recovery ventilation.

    If your project team is not comfortable following these guidelines, consider switching to Option 1, which gives you more flexibility. 


  • Although Option 2 is generally lower cost during the design phase than energy modeling, the compliance path is top heavy—it requires additional meeting time upfront for key design members. 


  • Option 3: Prescriptive—Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide


  • Provide a copy of the New Buildings Institute Advanced Buildings: Core Performance Guide to each team member. The guide is available to download free from the NBI website. (See Resources.) 


  • The guide provides practical design assistance that can be used throughout the design process.


  • Walk your team through the project checklist to clarify design goals and prescriptive requirements. 


  • The guide provides an outline for approaching an energy-efficient design, in addition to a list of prescriptive measures. The first of its three sections emphasizes process and team interaction rather than specific building systems or features. Advise the owner to read through the guide in order to understand what is required of the architect and engineers. 


  • Section 1 in the guide focuses on best practices that benefit the project during the pre-design and schematic design stages, such as analyzing alternative designs and writing the owner’s project requirements (OPR). 


  • Section 2 of the Core Performance Guide describes architectural, lighting, and mechanical systems to be included. Section 3 is not required for EAp2 but includes additional opportunities for energy savings that can earn EAc1 points. 


  • The guide mandates that your team develop a minimum of three different design concepts to select from for best energy use.


  • Though they can be a little daunting at first glance, a majority of the guide’s requirements overlap with other LEED credits, such as EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning, IEQp1: Minimum Indoor Air Quality Performance, and IEQc6.1: Controllability of Systems—Lighting Controls


  • This compliance path is top-heavy due to upfront consultant time, but it provides adequate structure to ensure that your project is in compliance with the prerequisite requirements. For some projects it may be less expensive to pursue than Option 1. 

Schematic Design

Expand All

  • The owner should now have finalized the OPR with the support of the architect, as part of the commissioning credits EAp1 and EAc3. The goals identified here will help your team identify energy-reduction and occupant-comfort strategies.


  • Consider a broad range of energy-efficiency strategies and tools, including passive solar, daylighting, cooling-load reduction, and natural ventilation to reduce heating and cooling loads. 


  • Develop the basis of design (BOD) document in conjunction with your mechanical engineer and architect for EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning, noting key design parameters to help strategize design direction as outlined in the OPR. 


  • The OPR and BOD serve the larger purpose of documenting the owner’s vision and your team’s ideas to meet those goals. The BOD is intended to be a work-in-progress and should be updated at all key milestones in your project. Writing the document gives you an opportunity to capture the owner’s goals, whether just to meet the prerequisite or to achieve points under EAc1.


  • Confirm that your chosen compliance path is the most appropriate for your project, and make any changes now. Following a review with the design team and owner, ensure that everyone is on board with contracting an energy modeler for Option 1 or meeting all the prescriptive requirements under Options 2 or 3. 


  • Sometimes teams change from Option 1 to Options 2 or 3 very late in the design phase for various reasons including not realizing the cost of energy modeling. Making that change is risky, though: the prescriptive paths are all-or-nothing—you must comply with every item, without exception. Evaluate each requirement and consult with the contractor and estimator to ensure the inclusion of all activities within project management. 


  • To avoid costly, last-minute decisions, develop a comprehensive, component-based cost model as a decision matrix for your project. The model will help establish additional cost requirements for each energy conservation measure. It will also illustrate cost reductions from decreased equipment size, construction rendered unnecessary by energy conservation measures, and reduced architectural provisions for space and equipment access. (See the Documentation Toolkit for an example.)


  • Use envelope design and passive strategies to reduce the heating and cooling loads prior to detailed design of HVAC systems. Passive strategies can reduce heating and cooling loads, giving the engineer more options, including smaller or innovative systems.


  • Load reduction requires coordinated efforts by all design members including the architect, lighting designer, interior designer, information-technology manager, and owner. 

    • Architects can choose the optimum building orientation, select the appropriate envelope system and design it to be tight, and configure programming to utilize passive strategies as much as possible. 
    • Lighting designers help by harvesting daylight, making appropriate fixture selections, minimizing lighting layouts (fewer fixtures), providing maximum controls and daylight and occupancy sensors to reduce wasted light. 
    • Interior designers are critical for selecting reflective finishes to enhance daylighting and specifying Energy Star appliances. 
    • IT specialists are important, especially in buildings with data centers, for selection of computers and data-processing equipment that reduce the power load as well as cooling. 

  • Involving facilities staff in the design process can further inform key design decisions, helping ensure successful operation and low maintenance costs.


  • Encourage your design team to brainstorm design innovations and energy-reduction strategies. This provides a communication link among team members so they can make informed decisions. 


  • More energy-efficient HVAC equipment can cost more relative to conventional equipment. However, by reducing heating and cooling loads through good passive design, the mechanical engineer can often reduce the size and cost of the system. Reduced system size can save money through:

    • smaller chillers or boilers;
    • smaller fans, used less frequently;
    • smaller pumps and auxiliary systems;
    • smaller ducts;
    • and less square footage devoted to mechanical systems.

  • Review case studies of similar energy-efficient buildings in the same climate to provide helpful hints for selecting energy-efficiency measures. For example, a building in a heating-dominated climate can often benefit from natural ventilation and free cooling during shoulder seasons. (See Resources for leading industry journals showcasing success stories around the country and internationally.)


  • The relationship between first costs and operating costs can be complex. For example, more efficient windows will be more expensive, but could reduce the size and cost of mechanical equipment. A more efficient HVAC system may be more expensive, but will reduce operating costs. Play around with variables and different strategies to get the right fit for the building and the owner’s goals as stated in the OPR.


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation


  • Review and confirm compliance with the mandatory requirements of all the relevant sections of ASHRAE 90.1-2007


  • Trust your project’s energy modeling task to a mechanical firm with a proven track record in using models as design tools, and experience with your building type.


  • Contract an energy modeling team for the project. These services may be provided by the mechanical engineering firm on the design team or by an outside consultant. Software used for detailed energy use analysis and submitted for final LEED certification must be accepted by the regulatory authority with jurisdiction, and must comply with paragraph G2.2 of ASHRAE Standard 90.1-2007. Refer to Resources for a list of Department of Energy approved energy-analysis software that may be used for LEED projects.


  • Design team members, including the architect and mechanical engineer at a minimum, need to work together to identify a percentage improvement goal for project energy use over the ASHRAE 90.1-2007-compliant baseline model. The percentage should be at least 10% to meet the prerequisite. 


  • Plan on initiating energy modeling during the design process, and use it to inform your design—preferably executing several iterations of the design as you improve the modeled energy performance. 


  • Ask the modeling consultant to develop an annual energy-use breakdown—in order to pick the “fattest” targets for energy reduction. A typical energy-use breakdown required for LEED submission and ASHRAE protocol includes: 

    • lighting;
    • space heating;
    • space cooling;
    • domestic hot water;
    • additional installed heat recovery, refrigeration, or heat-rejection systems;
    • ventilation fans and auxiliary pumps;
    • and equipment and plug loads. 

  • Identify critical areas in which to reduce loads. For example, in a data center, the plug loads are the largest energy load. Small changes in lighting density might bring down the energy use but represent only a small fraction of annual energy use. 


  • Don't forget that LEED (following ASHRAE) uses energy cost and not straight energy when it compares your design to a base case. That's important because you might choose to use a system that burns natural gas instead of electricity and come out with a lower cost, even though the on-site energy usage in kBtus or kWhs is higher. Generally you have to specify the same fuel in your design case and in the base case, however, so you can't simply switch fuels to show a cost savings


  • Explore and analyze design alternatives for energy use analyses to compare the cost-effectiveness of your design choices. For example, do you get better overall performance from a better window or from adding a PV panel? Will demand-control ventilation outperform increased ceiling insulation?


  • Simple, comparative energy analyses of conceptual design forms are useful ways to utilize an energy model at this stage. Sample scenarios include varying the area of east-facing windows and looking at 35% versus 55% glazing. Each scenario can be ranked by absolute energy use to make informed decisions during the design stage. 


  • If your project is using BIM software, the model can be plugged into the energy analysis software to provide quick, real-time results and support better decisions. 


  • Model development should be carried out following the PRM from ASHRAE 90.1-2007, Appendix G, and the LEED 2009 Design and Construction Reference Guide, Table in EAc1. In case of a conflict between ASHRAE and LEED guidelines, follow LEED.


  • Projects using district energy systems have special requirements. For EAp2, the proposed building must achieve the 10% energy savings without counting the effects of the district generation system. To earn points in EAc1 you can take advantage of the district system’s efficiency, but you have to run the energy model again to claim those benefits (see EAc1 for details). 


  • While you could run the required energy model at the end of the design development phase, simply to demonstrate your prerequisite compliance, you don’t get the most value that way in terms of effort and expense. Instead, do it early in the design phase, and run several versions as you optimize your design. Running the model also gives you an opportunity to make improvements if your project finds itself below the required 10% savings threshold.


  • The baseline model is the designed building with mechanical systems specified in ASHRAE 90.1-2007, Appendix G, for the specific building type, with a window-to-wall ratio at a maximum of 40%, and minimally code-compliant specifications for the envelope, lighting, and mechanical components. It can be developed as soon as preliminary drawings are completed. The baseline is compared to the design case to provide a percentage of reduction in annual energy use. To avoid any bias from orientation, you need to run the baseline model in each of the four primary directions, and the average serves as your final baseline figure. 


  • The design-case is modeled using the schematic design, orientation, and proposed window-to-wall ratio—¬the model will return design-case annual energy costs. Earn points by demonstrating percentage reductions in annual energy costs from the design to the baseline case. EAp2 is achieved if the design case is 10% lower than the baseline in new construction (or 5% less in existing building renovations). 


  • Provide as much project and design detail to the modeler as possible. A checklist is typically developed by the energy modeler, listing all the construction details of the walls, roof, slabs, windows, mechanical systems, equipment efficiencies, occupancy load, and schedule of operations. Any additional relevant information or design changes should be brought to the modeler’s attention as soon as possible. The more realistic the energy model is, the more accurate the energy use figure, leading to better help with your design.


  • Invite energy modelers to project meetings. An experienced modeler can often assist in decision-making during design meetings, even without running complete models each time. 


  • All known plug loads must be included in the model. The baseline and design-case models assume identical plug loads. If your project is deliberately attempting to reduce plug loads, demonstrate this by following the exceptional calculation method (ECM), as described in ASHRAE 90.1-2007, G2.5. Incorporate these results in the model to determine energy savings. 


  • For items outside the owner’s control—like lighting layout, fans and pumps—the parameters for the design and baseline models must be identical.


  • It can take anywhere from a few days to a few weeks to generate meaningful energy modeling results. Schedule the due dates for modeling results so that they can inform your design process.


  • Review the rate structure from your electrical utility. The format can inform your team of the measures likely to be most effective in reducing energy costs, especially as they vary over season, peak load, and additional charges beyond minimum energy use.


  • Performing a cost-benefit analysis in conjunction with energy modeling can determine payback times for all the energy strategies, helping the iterative design process.


  • Using energy modeling only to check compliance after the design stage wastes much of the value of the service, and thus your investment.


  • Option 2: Prescriptive—ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides 


  • The architect and mechanical engineer should carefully read the applicable ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for office, warehouse, or retail projects, as applicable. 


  • Keep the owner abreast of the design decisions dictated by the standard. Fill in the team-developed checklist, within the climate zone table’s prescribed requirements, with appropriate envelope improvements, system efficiencies, and a configuration that meets the standard requirements. 


  • As a prescriptive path, this option relies heavily on following the requirement checklist, which is used throughout the design process to track progress. To assist design development, provide all critical team members—not limited to the architect, mechanical and electrical engineers, and lighting designer—with a checklist highlighting their appointed tasks.


  • The architect, mechanical engineer, and lighting designer need to discuss each requirement and its design ramifications. Hold these meetings every six to eight weeks to discuss progress and make sure all requirements are being met.


  • Confirm that your project team is comfortable with following all the prescribed requirements. If not, switch to Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation. 


  • The LEED Online credit form does not specify how to document each prescriptive requirement because they are so different for each project; it only requires a signed confirmation by the MEP for meeting AEDG requirements. You still have to provide documentation. Submit your checklist of requirements, and supporting information for each item, through LEED Online to make your case. If your project fails to meet even one requirement, it will fail to earn the prerequisite, thus jeopardizing LEED certification.  


  • Although energy modeling consultant costs are avoided by this option, additional staff time will be required to document and track compliance status, as compared with conventional projects.


  • Energy efficiency measures prescribed by the guide can be perceived as additional costs in comparison with conventional projects. However, they are easy to implement and are cost-effective pn the whole.


  • Option 3: Prescriptive Compliance Path—Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide 


  • Become familiar with the Core Performance Guide early in the design phase to know the multiple requirements and all requisite documents.


  • Note that the guide demands additional time, attention, and integrated process from the design team as compared to conventional projects. It’s not just a list of prescriptive requirements, but a prescribed process for achieving energy efficiency goals. LEED Online documentation requires proof of all steps outlined in Sections 1 and 2, including three conceptual design options and meeting minutes. The project manager, architect, and mechanical engineer should read the complete Core Performance Guide carefully to know beforehand the prescriptive requirements in Sections 1 and 2. 


  • The project manager must take responsibility for ensuring that the requirement checklist is on track.


  • For Section 3, the design team needs to identify three or more of the listed strategies as possible targets for the project. 


  • Create a checklist of requirements and assign a responsible party to each item. 


  • The Core Performance Guide requires an integrated design contributed by the architect, mechanical and electrical engineers, and lighting designer. The project manager must take responsibility for shepherding and documenting the collaborative process to demonstrate compliance. 


  • A long documentation list can be overwhelming for your team, so create a detailed checklist with tasks delegated to individual team members, allowing each member to focus on assigned tasks. The checklist can function as a status tracking document and, finally, the deliverable for LEED Online.

Design Development

Expand All

  • The architect and engineer, and other project team members, continue to develop a high-performance building envelope with efficient mechanical and lighting systems. 


  • Constant communication and feedback among project team members, owner, and if possible, operational staff, during design development can minimize construction as well as operational costs and keep your project on schedule. 


  • If you change or go through value-engineering on any specifications, such as the solar-heat gain coefficient of glazing, for example, be aware of impacts on mechanical system sizing. Making changes like this might not pay off as much as it first appears.


  • Consider using building information modeling (BIM) tools to keep design decisions up to date and well documented for all team members.


  • Schedule delays can be avoided if all team members share their ideas and update documents during the design development process. 


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation


  • The modeler completes the energy analysis of the selected design and system and offers alternative scenarios for discussion. The modeler presents the energy cost reduction results to the team, identifying the LEED threshold achieved.


  • It’s helpful for the energy modeling report to include a simple payback analysis to assist the owner in making an informed decision on the operational savings of recommended features. 


  • The architect and HVAC engineer should agree on the design, working with the cost estimator and owner.


  • Demonstrating reductions in non-regulated loads requires a rigorous definition of the baseline case. The loads must be totally equivalent, in terms of functionality, to the proposed design case. For example, reducing the number of computers in the building does not qualify as a legitimate reduction in non-regulated loads. However, the substitution of laptops for desktop computers, and utilization of flat-screen displays instead of CRTs for the same number of computers, may qualify as a reduction.


  • Residential and hospitality projects that use low-flow showers, lavatories, and kitchen sinks (contributing to WEp1) benefit from lower energy use due to reduced overall demand for hot water. However, for energy-savings calculations, these are considered process loads that must be modeled as identical in baseline and design cases, or you have the choice of demonstrating the savings with ECM for process loads. 


  • Perform daylight calculations in conjunction with energy modeling to balance the potentially competing goals of more daylight versus higher solar-heat gain resulting in high cooling loads. 


  • If your project is pursuing renewable energy, the energy generated is accounted for by using the PRM. These results provide information about whether the energy is contributing to EAc2: Onsite Renewable Energy. 


  • A cost-benefit analysis can help the owner understand the return on investment of big-ticket, energy-conserving equipment that lowers operating energy bills with a quick payback. 


  • Complete at least half of the energy modeling effort by the end of the design development stage. Help the design team to finalize strategy through intensive, early efforts in energy modeling. Once the team has a design direction, the modeler can develop a second model during the construction documents phase for final confirmation. 


  • If pursuing ECM for non-regulated loads, calculate energy saving for each measure separately if you are, for example, installing an energy-efficient elevator instead of a typical one so that the reduction would contribute to total building energy savings. Calculate the anticipated energy use of the typical elevator in kBTUs or kWh. Using the same occupancy load, calculate the energy use of the efficient elevator. Incorporate the savings into design case energy use within the PRM. Refer to the ECM strategy for detailed calculation guidelines. 


  • Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path—ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides 


  • Ensure that all prescriptive requirements are incorporated into the design by the end of the design development stage.


  • Revisit the Advanced Energy Design Guides (AEDG) checklist to ensure that the design meets the prescriptive requirements.


  • Option 3: Prescriptive Compliance Path—Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide


  • The mechanical engineer, lighting consultant, and architect revisit the checklist for an update on the requirements and how they are being integrated into the design. All prescriptive requirements should be specifically incorporated into the design by the end of the design development phase. 


  • The mechanical engineer and architect track the status of each requirement.


  • While the LEED Online credit form does not require detailed documentation for each Core Performance Guide requirement, it is important that each item be documented as required and reviewed by the rest of the team to confirm compliance, especially as further documentation may be requested by during review. Your design team should work with the owner to identify cost-effective strategies from Section 3 that can be pursued for the project. 

Construction Documents

Expand All

  • Construction documents clearly detail the architectural and mechanical systems that address energy-efficiency strategies.  


  • Confirm that specifications and the bid package integrate all equipment and activities associated with the project. 


  • If the project goes through value engineering, refer to the OPR and BOD to ensure that no key comfort, health, productivity, daylight, or life-cycle cost concerns are sacrificed.


  • During the budget estimating phase, the project team may decide to remove some energy-saving strategies that have been identified as high-cost items during the value-engineering process. However, it is very important to help the project team understand that these so-called add-ons are actually integral to the building’s market value and the owner’s goals. 


  • Removing an atrium, for example, due to high cost may provide additional saleable floor area, but may also reduce daylight penetration while increasing the lighting and conditioning loads.  


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation


  • Although this prerequisite is a design-phase submittal, it may make sense to submit it, along with EAc1, after construction. Your project could undergo changes during construction that might compel a new run of the energy model to obtain the latest energy-saving information. Waiting until the completion of construction ensures that the actual designed project is reflected in your energy model.


  • Create a final energy model based completely on construction document drawings—to confirm actual energy savings as compared to ASHRAE 90.1-2007 requirements. An energy model based on the construction documents phase will provide realistic energy-cost savings and corresponding LEED points likely to be earned. 


  • Make sure the results fit the LEED Online credit form requirements. For example, the unmet load hours have to be less than 300 and process loads will raise a red flag if they’re not approximately 25%. If any of the results are off mark, take time to redo the model. Time spent in design saves more later on in the LEED review process. 


  • Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path—ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides


  • Finalize all design decisions and confirm that you’ve met all of the prescriptive requirements. Your team must document the checklist with relevant project drawings, including wall sections, specifications, and the MEP drawing layout.


  • Value engineering and other factors can result in design changes that eliminate certain energy features relevant to the prerequisite. As this compliance path is prescriptive, your project cannot afford to drop even one prescribed item.


  • Option 3: Prescriptive Compliance Path—Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide


  • Finalize all design decisions and confirm that you’ve met all of the prescriptive requirements. Your team must document the checklist with relevant project drawings, including wall sections, specifications, and the MEP drawing layout.


  • Value engineering and other factors can result in design changes that eliminate certain energy features relevant to the credit. As this compliance path is prescriptive, your project cannot afford to drop even one listed item. Although perceived as high-cost, prescriptive requirements lower energy costs during operation and provide a simple payback structure. 

Construction

Expand All

  • The architect and mechanical engineer review the shop drawings to confirm the installation of the selected systems. 


  • The commissioning agent and the contractor conduct functional testing of all mechanical equipment in accordance with EAp1: Fundamental Commissioning and EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning. 


  • Find your Energy Star rating with EPA’s Target Finder tool if your building type is in the database. Input your project location, size, and number of occupants, computers, and kitchen appliances. The target may be a percentage energy-use reduction compared to a code-compliant building, or “anticipated energy use” data from energy model results. Add information about your fuel use and rate, then click to “View Results.” Your Target Finder score should be documented at LEED Online.


  • Plan for frequent site visits by the mechanical designer and architect during construction and installation to make sure construction meets the design intent and specifications. 


  • Emphasize team interaction and construction involvement when defining the project scope with key design team members. Contractor and designer meetings can help ensure correct construction practices and avoid high change-order costs for the owner. 


  • Subcontractors may attempt to add a premium during the bidding process for any unusual or unknown materials or practices, so inform your construction bidders of any atypical design systems at the pre-bid meeting.


  • Option 1: Whole Building Energy Simulation


  • The energy modeler ensures that any final design changes have been incorporated into the updated model.


  • Upon finalizing of the design, the responsible party or energy modeler completes the LEED Online submittal with building design inputs and a PRM result energy summary. 


  • Although EAp2 is a design phase submittals, it may make sense to submit it (along with EAc1) after construction. Your project could undergo changes during construction that might require a new run of the energy model. Waiting until the completion of construction ensures that your actual designed project is reflected. On the other hand, it gives you less opportunity to respond to questions that might come up during a LEED review. 


  • Include supporting documents like equipment cut sheets, specifications and equipment schedules to demonstrate all energy efficiency measures claimed in the building. 


  • It common for the LEED reviewers to make requests for more information. Go along with the process—it doesn’t mean that you’ve lost the credit. Provide as much information for LEED Online submittal as requested and possible. 


  • Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path—ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guides (AEDG)


  • The design team completes the LEED Online documentation, signing off on compliance with the applicable AEDG, and writing the narrative report on the design approach and key highlights.


  • During LEED submission, the project team needs to make an extra effort to support the prerequisite with the completed checklist and the required documents. Although the LEED rating system does not list detailed documentation, it is best practice to send in supporting documents for the prescriptive requirements from the AEDG. The supporting documents should include relevant narratives, wall sections, mechanical drawings, and calculations. 


  • Although the LEED Online sign-off does not include a checklist of AEDG requirements, it assumes that the team member is confirming compliance with all detailed requirements of the guide. 


  • Option 3: Prescriptive Compliance Path—Advanced Building Core Performance Guide


  • The design team completes the LEED Online credit form, signing off on compliance with the Core Performance Guide, and writing the narrative report on the design approach and key highlights.


  • During LEED submission, your project team needs to make an extra effort to support the prerequisite with the completed checklist and the required documents. Although not every requirement may be mentioned in the LEED documentation, the supporting documents need to cover all requirements with narratives, wall sections, mechanical drawings, and calculations. 


  • Many of this option’s compliance documents are common to other LEED credits or design documents, thus reducing duplicated efforts. 

Operations & Maintenance

Expand All

  • Develop an operations manual with input from the design team in collaboration with facility management and commissioning agent if pursuing EAc3: Enhanced Commissioning. 


  • The benefit of designing for energy efficiency is realized only during operations and maintenance. Record energy use to confirm that your project is saving energy as anticipated. If you are not pursuing EAc5: Measurement and Verification, you can implement tracking procedures such as reviewing monthly energy bills or on-the-spot metering.


  • Some energy efficiency features may require special training for operations and maintenance personnel. For example, cogeneration and building automation systems require commissioning and operator training. Consider employing a trained professional to aid in creating operation manuals for specialty items. 


  • Energy-efficiency measures with a higher first cost often provide large savings in energy use and operational energy bills. These credit requirements are directly tied to the benefits of efficient, low-cost operations.

  • USGBC

    Excerpted from LEED 2009 for New Construction and Major Renovations

    EA Prerequisite 2: Minimum energy performance

    Required

    Intent

    To establish the minimum level of energy efficiency for the proposed building and systems to reduce environmental and economic impacts associated with excessive energy use.

    Requirements

    Projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016 must demonstrate an 18% improvement for new buildings, or a 14% improvement for major renovations to existing buildings.
    Option 1. Whole building energy simulation

    Demonstrate a 10% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for new buildings, or a 5% improvement in the proposed building performance rating for major renovations to existing buildings, compared with the baseline building performanceThe annual energy cost for a building design, used as a baseline for comparison with above-standard design. rating.

    Calculate the baseline building performance rating according to the building performance rating method in Appendix G of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 (with errata but without addenda1) using a computer simulation model for the whole building project. Projects outside the U.S. may use a USGBC approved equivalent standard2.

    Appendix G of Standard 90.1-2007 requires that the energy analysis done for the building performance rating method include all energy costs associated with the building project. To achieve points using this credit, the proposed design must meet the following criteria:

    • Comply with the mandatory provisions (Sections 5.4, 6.4, 7.4, 8.4, 9.4 and 10.4) in Standard 90.1-2007 (with errata but without addenda1) or USGBC approved equivalent.
    • Inclusion of all the energy costs within and associated with the building project.
    • Compare against a baseline building that complies with Appendix G of Standard 90.1-2007 (with errata but without addenda1) or USGBC approved equivalent. The default process energy cost is 25% of the total energy cost for the baseline building. If the building’s process energy cost is less than 25% of the baseline building energy cost, the LEED submittal must include documentation substantiating that process energy inputs are appropriate.

    For the purpose of this analysis, process energy is considered to include, but is not limited to, office and general miscellaneous equipment, computers, elevators and escalators,kitchen cooking and refrigeration, laundry washing and drying, lighting exempt from the lighting power allowance (e.g., lighting integral to medical equipment) and other (e.g., waterfall pumps).

    Regulated (non-process) energy includes lighting (for the interior, parking garage, surface parking, façade, or building grounds, etc. except as noted above), heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) (for space heating, space cooling, fans, pumps, toilet exhaust, parking garage ventilation, kitchen hood exhaust, etc.), and service water heating for domestic or space heating purposes.

    Process loads must be identical for both the baseline building performance rating and the proposed building performance rating. However, project teams may follow the exceptional calculation method (ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 G2.5) or USGBC approved equivalent to document measures that reduce process loads. Documentation of process load energy savings must include a list of the assumptions made for both the base and the proposed design, and theoretical or empirical information supporting these assumptions.

    Projects in California may use Title 24-2005, Part 6 in place of ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 for Option 1.

    OR

    Option 2 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
    Option 2. Prescriptive compliance path: ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide

    Comply with the prescriptive measures of the ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide appropriate to the project scope, outlined below. Project teams must comply with all applicable criteria as established in the Advanced Energy Design Guide for the climate zoneOne of five climatically distinct areas, defined by long-term weather conditions which affect the heating and cooling loads in buildings. The zones were determined according to the 45-year average (1931-1975) of the annual heating and cooling degree-days (base 65 degrees Fahrenheit). An individual building was assigned to a climate zone according to the 45-year average annual degree-days for its National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Division. in which the building is located. Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

    Path 1. ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Office Buildings 2004

    The building must meet the following requirements:

    • Less than 20,000 square feet (1,800 square meters).
    • Office occupancy.
    Path 2. ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Retail Buildings 2006

    The building must meet the following requirements:

    • Less than 20,000 square feet (1,800 square meters).
    • Retail occupancy.
    Path 3. ASHRAE Advanced Energy Design Guide for Small Warehouses and Self Storage Buildings 2008

    The building must meet the following requirements:

    • Less than 50,000 square feet (4,600 square meters).
    • Warehouse or self-storage occupancy.

    OR

    Option 3 is not an eligible compliance option for projects that registered on or after April 8, 2016.
    Option 3. Prescriptive compliance path: Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide

    Comply with the prescriptive measures identified in the Advanced Buildings™ Core Performance™ Guide developed by the New Buildings Institute. The building must meet the following requirements:

    • Less than 100,000 square feet (9,300 square meters).
    • Comply with Section 1: Design Process Strategies, and Section 2: Core Performance Requirements.
    • Health care, warehouse and laboratory projects are ineligible for this path.

    Projects outside the U.S. may use ASHRAE/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 Appendices B and D to determine the appropriate climate zone.

    OR

    Option 4. Brazil compliance path: PBE Edifica

    Projects in Brazil that are certified at the “A” level under the Regulation for Energy Efficiency Labeling (PBE Edifica) program for all attributes (Envelope, Lighting, HVAC) achieve this prerequisite. The following building types cannot achieve this prerequisite using this option: Healthcare, Data Centers, Manufacturing Facilities, Warehouses, and Laboratories.

    1Project teams wishing to use ASHRAE approved addenda for the purposes of this prerequisite may do so at their discretion. Addenda must be applied consistently across all LEED credits.

    2 Projects outside the U.S. may use an alternative standard to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007 if it is approved by USGBC as an equivalent standard using the process identified in the LEED 2009 Green Building Design and Construction Global ACP Reference Guide Supplement.

    Pilot ACPs Available

    The following pilot alternative compliance path is available for this prerequisite. See the pilot credit library for more information.

    EApc95: Alternative Energy Performance Metric ACP

    Potential Technologies & Strategies

    Design the building envelope and systems to meet baseline requirements. Use a computer simulation model to assess the energy performance and identify the most cost-effective energy efficiency measures. Quantify energy performance compared with a baseline building.

    If local code has demonstrated quantitative and textual equivalence following, at a minimum, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) standard process for commercial energy code determination, then the results of that analysis may be used to correlate local code performance with ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2007. Details on the DOE process for commercial energy code determination can be found at http://www.energycodes.gov/implement/
    determinations_com.stm.

    FOOTNOTES

    1 Project teams wishing to use ASHRAE approved addenda for the purposes of this prerequisite may do so at their discretion. Addenda must be applied consistently across all LEED credits.

    2 Projects outside the U.S. may use an alternative standard to ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1‐2007 if it is approved by USGBC as an equivalent standard using the process located at www.usgbc.org/leedisglobal

Organizations

Database of State Incentives for Renewables and Efficiency (DSIRE)

This database shows state-by-state incentives for energy efficiency, renewable energy, and other green building measures. Included in this database are incentives on demand control ventilation, ERVs, and HRVs.


New York State Energy Research and Development Authority (NYSERDA)

Useful web resource with information on local/regional incentives for energy-efficiency programs.


American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy

ACEEE is a nonprofit organization dedicated to advancing energy efficiency through technical and policy assessments; advising policymakers and program managers; collaborating with businesses, public interest groups, and other organizations; and providing education and outreach through conferences, workshops, and publications. 


New Buildings Institute

The New Buildings Institute is a nonprofit, public-benefits corporation dedicated to making buildings better for people and the environment. Its mission is to promote energy efficiency in buildings through technology research, guidelines, and codes.


U.S. Department of Energy, Building Energy Codes Program

The Building Energy Codes program provides comprehensive resources for states and code users, including news, compliance software, code comparisons, and the Status of State Energy Codes database. The database includes state energy contacts, code status, code history, DOE grants awarded, and construction data. The program is also updating the COMcheck-EZ compliance tool to include ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA 90.1–2007. This compliance tool includes the prescriptive path and trade-off compliance methods. The software generates appropriate compliance forms as well. 


Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute: Daylighting Resources

Research center at RPI provides access to a wide range of  daylighting resources, case studies, design tools, reports, publications and more.


IBPSA

International association of energy modelers with various national and local chapters. 


Architecture 2030

Non-profit organization aiming at design community to increase collaboration for designing energy efficient buildings.


Low Impact Hydropower Institute

The Low Impact Hydropower Institute is a non-profit organization and certification body that establishes criteria against which to judge the environmental impacts of hydropower projects in the United States.


U.S. Department of Energy Building Technologies Program

The Building Technologies Program (BTP) provides resources for commercial and residential building components, energy modeling tools, building energy codes, and appliance standards including the Buildings Energy Data Book, High Performance Buildings Database and Software Tools Directory.

Web Tools

Energy Analysis Tools

This website discusses the step-by-step process for energy modeling.


Advanced Buildings Technologies and Practices

This online resource, supported by Natural Resources Canada, presents energy-efficient technologies, strategies for commercial buildings, and pertinent case studies.


U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

This website is a comprehensive resource for U.S. Department of Energy information on energy efficiency and renewable energy and provides access to energy links and downloadable documents. 


U.S. EPA, Combined Heat and Power Partnership

Information on cogenerationThe simultaneous production of electric and thermal energy in on-site, distributed energy systems; typically, waste heat from the electricity generation process is recovered and used to heat, cool, or dehumidify building space. Neither generation of electricity without use of the byproduct heat, nor waste-heat recovery from processes other than electricity generation is included in the definition of cogeneration., also called combined heat and power, is available from EPA through the CHPCombined heat and power (CHP), or cogeneration, generates both electrical power and thermal energy from a single fuel source. Partnership. The CHP Partnership is a voluntary program seeking to reduce the environmental impact of power generation by promoting the use of CHP. The Partnership works closely with energy users, the CHP industry, state and local governments, and other clean energy stakeholders to facilitate the development of new projects and to promote their environmental and economic benefits. 


Advanced Energy Design Guides

Free download of AHSRAE energy savings guide, use for Option 2.


Lawrence Berkeley Lab: Building Technologies Department

Research warehouse for strategies and case studies of energy efficiency in buildings.


Efficient Windows Collaborative

An online window selection tool with performance characteristics.


Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG)

This website lays out design process for developing an energy efficient building.


AIA Sustainability 2030 Toolkit

This website discusses ways to improve design for lower energy demand as they relate to the AIA 2030 challenge.


Windows for High-Performance Commercial Buildings

This website includes discussion of design issues, materials and assemblies, window design decisions and case studies. 


California Integrated Waste Management Board: Environmental and Economic Assessment Tools

This site lists multiple web-based and downloadable tools that can be used for energy analyses.


DEER: Database for Energy Efficient Resource

This database is maintainted by the California Energy Commission and lists resources related to energy use and efficiency. 


Energy Design Resources - CA

Energy design tools are available to be used for free online or available to download.


Building Materials Property Table

This website lists performance characteristics for various envelope materials. 


One Building

This is an online forum of discussion for energy efficiency, computer model software users.


EPA’s Target Finder

Target Finder is a goal-setting tool that informs your design team about their project’s energy performance as compared to a national database of projects compiled by the EPA.


Building Energy Software Tools Directory

This directory provides information on 406 building software tools for evaluating energy efficiency, renewable energy, and sustainability in buildings.


EnergyPlus Format Weather Data Resources

Weather data for more than 2100 locations are available in EnergyPlus weather format.


DOE-2 Format Weather Data Resources

Weather data for U.S. and Non-U.S. locations in BIN format.


BEMbook – Building Energy Modeling Book

A web-based, free content project by IBPSA-USA to develop an online compendium of the domain of Building Energy Modeling (BEM). The intention is to delineate a cohesive body of knowledge for building energy modeling.

Technical Guides

Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide

A guide for achieving energy efficiency in new commercial buildings, referenced in the LEED energy credits.


ENERGY STAR Building Upgrade Manual

This manual is a strategic guide for planning and implementing energy-saving building upgrades. It provides general methods for reviewing and adjusting system control settings, plus procedures for testing and correcting calibration and operation of system components such as sensors, actuators, and controlled devices.


Treatment of District or Campus Thermal Energy in LEED V2 and LEED 2009 – Design & Construction

This document is USGBC’s second (v2.0) major release of guidance for district or campus thermal energy in LEED, and is a unified set of guidance comprising the following an update to the original Version 1.0 guidance released May 2008 for LEED v2.x and the initial release of formal guidance for LEED v2009.


COMNET Commercial Buildings Energy Modeling Guidelines and Procedures

This manual offers guidance to building energy modelers, ensuring technically rigorous and credible assessment of energy performance of commercial and multifamily residential buildings. It provides a streamlined process that can be used with various existing modeling software and systems, across a range of programs.


2009 ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals, Chapter 19

Chapter 19 is titled, “Energy Estimating and Modeling Methods”. The chapter discusses methods for estimating energy use for two purposes: modeling for building and HVAC system design and associated design optimization (forward modeling), and modeling energy use of existing buildings for establishing baselines and calculating retrofit savings (data-driven modeling).


Treatment of Distric or Campus Thermal Energy in LEED v2 and LEED 2009 (Updated August 13, 2010)

Required reference document for DESDistrict energy system: a central energy conversion plant and transmission and distribution system that provides thermal energy to a group of buildings (e.g., a central cooling plant on a university campus). It does not include central energy systems that provide only electricity. systems in LEED energy credits.

Publications

ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1–2007 User’s Manual (ASHRAE).

ASHRAE writes standards for the purpose of establishing consensus for: 1) methods of test for use in commerce and 2) performance criteria for use as facilitators with which to guide the industry.


Energy Information Administration

Energy statistics from the U.S. government.


New Buildings Institute— Advanced Lighting Guidelines: 2003 Edition

This guide includes instructional graphics and superior lighting design solutions for varying types of buildings and spaces, from private offices to big box retail stores.


Building Energy Performance News

This website offers information on energy efficiency in buildings, highlighting success stories, breakthrough technology, and policy updates.


GreenSource magazine

Bimonthly publication on case studies and new technologies for energy efficiency in commercial buildings. 


AIA Local Leaders in Sustainability: Green Incentives

AIA publication highlighting local and state green building incentives.


Federal Research and Devlopment Agenda for Net-Zero Energy, High-Performance Green Buildings

2008 guidelines and performance goals from the National Science and Technology Council.


Energy Design Resources (EDR) Simulation Guidebooks

Information about energy-efficient building practices available in EDR's Design Briefs, Design Guidelines, Case Studies, and Technology Overviews.

Software Tools

Building Energy Software Tools Directory

DOE tools for whole building analyses, including energy simulation, load calculation, renewable energy, retrofit analysis and green buildings tools.


Building and Fire Research Laboratory

This is a computer program that predicts the one-dimensional transfer of heat and moisture.


DesignBuilder and EnergyPlus

DesignBuilder is a Graphical User Interface to EnergyPlus. DesignBuilder is a complete 3-D graphical design modeling and energy use simulation program providing information on building energy consumption, CO2Carbon dioxide emissions, occupant comfort, daylighting effects, ASHRAE 90.1 and LEED compliance, and more.


Integrated Environmental Solutions – Virtual Environment Pro / Apache

IES VE Pro is an integrated computing environment encompassing a wide range of tasks in building design including model building, energy/carbon, solar, light, HVAC, climate, airflow, value/cost and egress.

Advanced Energy Design Guide Checklist

Option 2: Prescriptive Compliance Path

Use this checklist of prescriptive requirements (with sample filled out) to have an at-a-glance picture of AEDG requirements for Option 2, and how your project is meeting them.

Advanced Buildings Core Performance Guide (CPG) Checklist

Option 3

This spreadsheet lists all the requirements for meeting EAp2 – Option 3 and and EAc1 – Option 3. You can review the requirements, assign responsible parties and track status of each requirement through design and construction.

Energy Simulation Narrative

Option 1

Sometimes the energy simulation software being used to demonstrate compliance with Option 1 doesn't allow you to simulate key aspects of the design. In this situation you'll need to write a short sample narrative, as in these examples, describing the situation and how it was handled.

Equipment and Product Cut Sheets

All Options

In your supporting documentation, include spec sheets of equipment described in the Option 1 energy model or Options 2–3 prescriptive paths.

PRM Table

Option 1

This is a sample building energy performance and cost summary using the Performance Rating Method (PRM). Electricity and natural gas use should be broken down by end uses including space heating, space cooling, lights, task lights, ventilation fans, pumps, and domestic hot water, at the least.

Tariff Charges

Option 1

Option 1 calculates savings in annual energy cost, but utility prices may vary over the course of a year. This sample demonstrates how to document varying electricity tariffs.

Modeled Energy Reductions

Option 1

This graph, for an office building design, shows how five overall strategies were implemented to realize energy savings of 30% below an ASHRAE baseline. (From modeling conducted by Synergy Engineering, PLLC.)

U.S. Climate Zones

All Options

The climate zones shown on this Department of Energy map are relevant to all options for this credit.

Appendix G Fan Power Calculator

Option 1

This spreadsheet, provided here by 7group, can be used to calculate the fan volume and fan power for Appendix G models submitted for EAp2/EAc1.  Tabs are included to cover both ASHRAE 90.1-2004 and 90.1-2007 Appendix G methodologies.

LEED Online Forms: NC-2009 EA

Sample LEED Online forms for all rating systems and versions are available on the USGBC website.

Design Submittal

PencilDocumentation for this credit can be part of a Design Phase submittal.

4033 Comments

0
0
Billy Condor Engineer
Jun 22 2017
Guest
36 Thumbs Up

Natural Ventilation modeling question

Project Location: Peru

Hello!

An educational building will have no AA for its classroom, workshops and labs (mainly 90% of the project area), as all these areas will be naturally ventilated (complying with section 5.1 of ASHRAE 62.1-2007). I'm going to make the energy model for this project, so I've reading the "ANSI/ASHRAE /IES Standard 90.1-2010 Performance Rating Method Reference Manual" prepared for the US DOE (cited before here if I'm not mistaken), it says: "In the case when the thermal zone does not have a cooling system: The thermal zone in the proposed design is modeled with no cooling when the natural ventilation system maintains temperature. For periods when the space temperature is greater than the cooling setpoint, a cooling system like the one for the baseline building is assumed to operate to maintain temperature. The fans in this simulated system cycle with loads. The corresponding thermal zone in the baseline building is not modeled with natural ventilation. The baseline building HVAC system, as defined in Standard 90.1-2010, Section G3.1.1 (Table 1 and Table 2 of this document), provides cooling to maintain thermostat setpoint.".

1. Is this approach also valid if using version 2007 of ASHRAE 90.1?
2. Just to make sure what Baseline system (from table G3.1.1A) should I use; it's an eleven-story building, but the conditioned area is less than 14000 square meters (just some offices), so is it ok System 8?

Many thanks in advance.

Post a Reply
0
0
Courtney Royal, LEED AP BD+C Sr. Sustainability Consultant Taitem Engineering
Jun 20 2017
LEEDuser Member
1974 Thumbs Up

is there a compliance path for multiple baselines?

Can LEED v2009 projects (which has ASHRAE 90.1-2007 baseline) demonstrate compliance using ASHRAE 90.1-2013? Is there any adjusted point scale which can be applicable for such projects? We have a project that needs to be modeled to ASHRAE 90.1-2013 Standard as per incentive requirement. Do we need to create two different models for each baseline?

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 20 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

I have not seen an interpolation table for LEED v2009 projects to apply 90.1-2013.

You could try to make the case that 2013 is more stringent and therefore using it would produce a conservative result. You would then apply the 2010 adjusted point scale knowing you might be leaving some points behind.

Creating a 2013 baseline and a 2010 baseline would not likely require huge changes so I don't see it as a major effort.

Post a Reply
0
0
Billy Condor Engineer
Jun 19 2017
Guest
36 Thumbs Up

Water Heater efficiency per table 7.8 of ASHRAE 90.1-2007

Project Location: Peru

Hello,
As required by 7.4.2 Equipment Efficiency of ASHRAE 90.1-2007, for a water heater less than 12 kW and more that 20 gal, the required performance is EF=0.97-0.00132*V.
My question is: is there any other way to show compliance with this? Maybe with some other efficiency parameter or some good insulation value? Because I've been making some research and there are no companies that sell that product with that specification in my country (Peru).
Thanks in advance.

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 19 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

I am not aware of any other method to demonstrate compliance.

Perhaps you could work with a manufacturer who could help you demonstrate compliance using the referenced standard or demonstrate some similar standard is equivalent.

Post a Reply
0
0
Joseph Chappell Energy Engineer Design Engineers
Jun 15 2017
Guest
32 Thumbs Up

Crawlspace and Attic Classification

Project Location: United States

I am working on an existing building renovation where there is a significant amount of building floor area that is crawlspace and attic area. I am completing the v4 Minimum Energy Performance Calculator (latest Excel Table 1.4 version) as a requirement of applying LEED InterpretationLEED Interpretations are official answers to technical inquiries about implementing LEED on a project. They help people understand how their projects can meet LEED requirements and provide clarity on existing options. LEED Interpretations are to be used by any project certifying under an applicable rating system. All project teams are required to adhere to all LEED Interpretations posted before their registration date. This also applies to other addenda. Adherence to rulings posted after a project registers is optional, but strongly encouraged. LEED Interpretations are published in a searchable database at usgbc.org. 10421. In this Excel form, there are spaces to input the Conditioned building area square footage and the Unconditioned building area square footage.

By following the definitions in ASHRAE 90.1, I am confused on how to classify the crawlspace and attic area as either conditioned or unconditioned. The ASHRAE 90.1 definition of an unconditioned space is an enclosed space within a building that is not a conditioned space or a semi heated space. Crawlspaces, attics, and parking garages with natural or mechanical ventilation are not considered enclosed spaces. Ventilation is further defined as the process of supplying or removing air by natural or mechanical means to or from any space. Such air is not required to have been conditioned.

The crawlspaces and attics in this project both have ventilation by the above definition. There is a small amount of heating capacity designed for these spaces, enough to be considered semi-heated (>3.4 BtuA unit of energy consumed by or delivered to a building. A Btu is an acronym for British thermal unit and is defined as the amount of energy required to increase the temperature of 1 pound of water by 1 degree Fahrenheit, at normal atmospheric pressure. Energy consumption is expressed in Btu to allow for consumption comparisons among fuels that are measured in different units./h-ft2), except that by above definitions the attic and crawlspace are not considered enclosed.

Does anyone have any advice on how to classify these spaces?

1
1
0
Jean Marais b.i.g. Bechtold DesignBuilder Expert Jun 16 2017 LEEDuser Member 11072 Thumbs Up

1) All energy uses must be accounted for, regardless (that means fans, heaters, etc.).
2) crawlspaces are considered "not enclosed". therefore they cannot be considered an unconditioned space. Infact, if you see the definition of a "space", then they are not considered "spaces".

This makes sense, if you think about it. The cold ventilated attic in my house is seperated from the rooms below by the thermal/moisture-retarder/air barrier and is considered outside the thermal envelope. There may be spaces wrapped with in the volume of the building that are "outside" the envelope. That is they lay geometrically within the volume, but there definition seperates them from the volume.

Post a Reply
0
0
Madushan Samarakoon
Jun 11 2017
Guest

Baseline system selection

I am working with a data center project which have 3 floors but air conditioned area is less than 25000 sqft. But total area is exceeding 25000 sqft with unconditioned toilets and corridors. heating system is electric

1. What system should I use ?? system 4 or system 6
2. If few unconditioned spaces are located adjacent to conditioned spaces and should I consider those unconditioned areas also in selecting the HVAC system

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 19 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

The baseline system selection is based on conditioned space. This includes semi-heated and indirectly conditioned spaces. See the definitions section of the standard for further guidance.

Post a Reply
0
0
VEL MUTHU
Jun 02 2017
Guest
190 Thumbs Up

DCV In Baseline

Project Location: Qatar

Hi all,
Modelling DCV has been discussed many times in this forum. I gone through and understand quite a bit. I am listing my understanding along with some quires. Any response is much appreciated.

Our project is in Zone1A and is a metro transport building. project design considers Co2Carbon dioxide sensors for DCV in zone level and system level in densely occupied area to meet the requirement of ASHRAE and LEED IEQC1 i.e. where the density is more than 25 people per 1000 sqft. Project also employs DOAS with Heat recovery to supply fresh air all the equipment inside the building i.e. AHU1.Air-handling units (AHUs) are mechanical indirect heating, ventilating, or air-conditioning systems in which the air is treated or handled by equipment located outside the rooms served, usually at a central location, and conveyed to and from the rooms by a fan and a system of distributing ducts. (NEEB, 1997 edition) 2.A type of heating and/or cooling distribution equipment that channels warm or cool air to different parts of a building. This process of channeling the conditioned air often involves drawing air over heating or cooling coils and forcing it from a central location through ducts or air-handling units. Air-handling units are hidden in the walls or ceilings, where they use steam or hot water to heat, or chilled water to cool the air inside the ductwork., FCU, CRAC.

I modelled same outdoor air quantity for base and proposed case.
My confusion is listed below and appreciate any clarification on this:

1. As some of the space meets the section 6.4.3.9, do I need to model DCV in Baseline?

2. I hope, the answer would be “yes” for my first question. In such case, how to model it in baseline. Let’s say there are 100 zones in a floor and 3 zones in that floor are highly occupied area (DCV required). There will be one system for the whole floor as per G3.1.1, which says, for systems 5,6,7and 8, each floor shall be modelled with a separate HVAC system. We can model DCV schedule in system level which will apply to all the zones served by the system. In this case, apart from these three zones, other 97 zones will have considered to have demand control ventilation. How to address this issue? FYI, I am using Equest software.

3. To address the above issue, can I provided separate system (System 3 or 4) for these zones only to model DCV as the Minimum OA schedule varies significantly w.r.t other zones served by this same system in baseline?

4. If the answer is no for my first question can I just model DCV in Proposed case and take credit? (hopefully the answer will be no).

5. The zones with high dense occupancy required to have DCV in base line has DCV control designed in the proposed case. Since DCV is required to be there in both base and proposed can I not model DCV in both the cases?

Request prompt response and appreciate any response.

Regards
VEL

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 02 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

1. Yes
2. I think you can enable DCV at the system level and then enter a specific constant cfm at the zone level for those zones without DCV and a cfm/person for zones with DCV. This would then map to the occupancy schedule for that space.
3. If you can't do the above then you should create a separate system with the same parameters (efficiency, etc.) as the system for that floor. You should explain what you have done in a narrative to the reviewer.
4. It is no.
5. You do model DCV in both cases and the quantity of outside air should be identical in these spaces.

Post a Reply
0
0
Brian Kenney
Jun 01 2017
Guest

System Type 9 Baseline Fan Sizing

Project Location: United States

I am working on a job with the Army Corps of Engineers that has a vehicle maintenance workbay with general exhaust requirements of 1.5 CFM/SF dictated by the RFP. We are to provide makeup air to maintain a slight negative pressure in the space via a hot water make up air unit. The airflow rate in the proposed case is being dictated by the exhaust requirements in the RFP.

Appendix G states that the baseline fan sizing for System Type 9 shall be based on the required air with a 105 discharge air temp, minimum outside air, or "as required to comply with applicable codes or accreditation standards."

My question is can I model the airflow identically in the proposed and baseline cases as the airflow is dictated by the RFP (could this be considered an accreditation standard as the Army Corps of Engineers are dictating this design criteria?)

Any help would be greatly appreciated!

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 02 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

The quantity of outdoor air is always modeled identically in both based on the proposed design (unless there is DCV in the proposed).

The proposed would be modeled as designed and the baseline according to Appendix G. The exhaust fans sound like they are part of the system so they are basically already included in the baseline fan power allowance of 0.3 W/cfm and should not be added separately.

Post a Reply
0
0
Joseph Chappell Energy Engineer Design Engineers
May 30 2017
Guest
32 Thumbs Up

Treatment of Outdoor Air for Incomplete Spaces

I recently received LEED review comments regarding the treatment of incomplete space in an energy model for a proposed new construction building. Several different comments were given by the reviewer regarding how to model equivalently in the Baseline and Proposed the occupancy, equipment power, LPDLighting power density (LPD) is the amount of electric lighting, usually measured in watts per square foot, being used to illuminate a given space. (Building Area Method), thermal zones, etc. In my case, the thermal zones have not yet been designed. Therefore, I will treat them as described in Table G3.1#8 of Appendix G.

What was absent from these review comments and, as farFloor-area ratio is the density of nonresidential land use, exclusive of parking, measured as the total nonresidential building floor area divided by the total buildable land area available for nonresidential structures. For example, on a site with 10,000 square feet (930 square meters) of buildable land area, an FAR of 1.0 would be 10,000 square feet (930 square meters) of building floor area. On the same site, an FAR of 1.5 would be 15,000 square feet (1395 square meters), an FAR of 2.0 would be 20,000 square feet (1860 square meters), and an FAR of 0.5 would be 5,000 square feet (465 square meters). as I can tell, the verbiage of Appendix G is guidance on how to treat (calculate) outdoor air requirements for the incomplete spaces. For the rest of the building, outdoor air requirements are treated as equivalent in the Baseline and Proposed buildings. However, the exact outdoor air requirements for the incomplete space will depend on some factors that aren't spelled out by the System Types in Appendix G such as ventilation effectiveness, etc.

Does anyone have any guidance on the appropriate way to treat outdoor air for incomplete spaces or if it should even be included at all?

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 30 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

You must model the quantity of outdoor air identically in each model. Same rule as for completed spaces.

Post a Reply
0
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager Termoservice OOD
May 28 2017
LEEDuser Member
477 Thumbs Up

Baseline Hot water pump power for Purchased heat

Project Location: Russian Federation

Greetings,
The project we are modeling follows LEDD v3 - 2007 (System 7) and the heating source is purchased heat. There are two question related to this issue.

1. Is there some interpretation or other amendments clearing how much will be the pump power, because it is written (G3.1.3.5) "….(except for purchased water or steam)…".

2. The allowed pump power in W/gpm is it per all heating water system or it could be split somehow (as per floor area)
Your advice will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.

1
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 29 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

You can model it identical to the proposed pumps, since 90.1-2007 does not say how to model them.

You can also apply Addendum ai which would have you model them at 14 W/gpm. It is all primary pump and is not split.

2
3
0
Bob Crowell Vice President / Principal, 2rw Consultants, Inc. Jun 21 2017 LEEDuser Member 72 Thumbs Up

Hey Marcus,

Applying Addendum ai does not give me any direction on whether or not these pumps should be variable speed.

Any ideas if whether or not it is based on square footage?

Thanks

3
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Jun 21 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

If you go back to G3.1.3.5 I think it is variable over 120,000 sf and riding the curve if under.

Post a Reply
0
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager Termoservice OOD
May 27 2017
LEEDuser Member
477 Thumbs Up

Baseline Chiller plant - System7

Project Location: Russian Federation

Greetings,
Could you please provide some advice to the following case (the building belongs to System 7):

1. Proposed project is arranged with water cooled chillers and dry coolers (cooling towers of close type). They coolers were chosen because the chiller plant is supposed to operate at minus outdoor temperature conditions. Also following this approach there is a heat exchanger separating the dry coolers and condenser circuit, whereby the dry cooler loop is filled with a glycol/water mixture in order to prevent freezing.

2. The Baseline plant, as per app. G should have cooling tower. It has not been specified whether this cooling tower is of open or closed type and it has been prescribed a fix pump power value of 19 W/gpm.

The question is:
Should we model the Baseline also with dry coolers and glycol loop. There should be such option because in climate zones 6, 7 and eventually 8 and also by System 7, an open cooling tower will face problems and therefore a comparison between items 1. and 2. above will be made at not equal operating conditions.
You advice on the matter will be highly appreciated.
Thanks.

1
5
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 29 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

I think you are trying to design the baseline. It should be an open tower.

2
5
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager, Termoservice OOD May 30 2017 LEEDuser Member 477 Thumbs Up

Hi Marcus,
Thanks for the reply.
Regarding the operation of an open cooling tower during low outdoor temperature. Is there some interpretation which would allow some amtifreezing preventions for the Baseline, because practically when the open cooling tower can not function during cold weather and at the same time there is a cooling load, it can not be covered.
Actually what could be the concept of Baseline modeling in such cases.
Thanks.

3
5
0
Jean Marais b.i.g. Bechtold DesignBuilder Expert May 30 2017 LEEDuser Member 11072 Thumbs Up

Hi Marcus, this is a relevant case. We use "super software" bent on modelling everything soooo accurately, and then we sit back and try to simulate JANK that does not fly in real life. And if the software even lets it run...somehow...we're bound to get a load of warnings that need explaining to the reviewers. Anyway, this could go on a list of 90.1 improvements.

4
5
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 30 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Why do you need to run a chiiler/tower at minus outdoor temperatures? Does not sound like cooling for human comfort.

5
5
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager, Termoservice OOD May 30 2017 LEEDuser Member 477 Thumbs Up

That's right, it is for a Data center.

There are also some more question of how to model Data centers and computer rooms in LEED v3, which we've bben planing to send you tomorrow.
In general in 90.1 2013, app. G it has been clearly explained - some cases should follow systems 3 (4), some however system 11.
If we follow these rules, what should we do in terms of explaining it to revierers.
Thanks.

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 24 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Technically the 4th floor must be modeled identically to the baseline even if the owner says that it will be fitted out identical to the 3rd. Projects can only claim credit for the current scope of work of the project, not for future scopes of work.

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Hongyun Zhou
May 23 2017
Guest
95 Thumbs Up

unfinished space simulation

Project Location: China

My building has four floors, and 4th flr is left empty for future use. I did not include it in simulation, so I got the comments from the reviewer: Revise the model as necessary to include all unfinished space, and to model any unfinished lighting, HVAC, and receptacle systems identically in the baseline and proposed case, consistent with ASHRAE 90.1 baseline requirements.
On the other hand, the owner has identified the design of 4th flr will be the same as 3rd flr, current system has taken 4th flr into account.
My question is how to simulation 4th flr in proposed model? Should I use the parameters on 3rd flr or refer to baseline model?

Post a Reply
0
0
Maria Spastri Sustainability Consultant AECOM
May 22 2017
LEEDuser Member
13 Thumbs Up

Humidifier

Project Location: United States

Hi,
Our project is going for LEED. We have 2 proposed CRAC system that have humidifiers. It's not quite clear which approach we should take regarding the energy associated with the humidifiers:
1) Run a model with the humidifiers, one without; and the discrepancy in energy to be added to the results of both baseline and proposed under process loads.
2) Use the results when humidifiers are modeled (impact on space heating, cooling and heat rejection).
Thank you,
Maria

1
4
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 22 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Humidification is considered a process load so it must be modeled identically. Report the energy use as a separate line item in the modeling results. Often the energy use is not identical even when modeling identical humidification systems.

2
4
0
Maria Spastri Sustainability Consultant, AECOM May 22 2017 LEEDuser Member 13 Thumbs Up

Hi Markus, thanks for the prompt reply.
The proposed system uses electricity for the heating and humidifier.
The baseline system uses gas heat exchanger for heating (this is how it has to be modeled per Appendix G).Trace does not allow to incorporate an electric humidifier on an a gas system. A system can only have one source of fuel for the heating side. For reference, the humidifier control in the proposed is 40%. Therefore: we'd model the same 40% humidity control approach both baseline and proposed, even if the fuel is different? Please confirm or advise.
Thanks,
Maria

3
4
0
R2M Solution Srl R2M Solution Srl May 23 2017 LEEDuser Member 236 Thumbs Up

It seems strange that the design model and the baseline model have different heating sources (see G3.1.1 and Table G3.1.1A).

4
4
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 24 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

You should not have different heating fuels except in only the rarest of circumstances. Sounds like the majority of the building is gas heat and these spaces are electric. Do any of the G3.1.1 exceptions apply to these spaces? Sounds like maybe exception b applies. If is does then the baseline is a system 4.

Post a Reply
0
0
Michael O'Shea
May 15 2017
Guest

Alternative to Table 1.4

Project Location: United States

When submitting energy models to NYC we have to fill out a form called an EN-1 that is very similar to Table 1.4 and provides the same information. Can we provide the EN-1 in place of Table 1.4? Currently we are essentially filling out the same form twice. Has anyone been successful with submitting an alternate form in place of Table 1.4. Did LEED require any additional documentation?

The model that we are hoping to do this for is registered under v3 and we would using an ASHRAE 2010 baseline as per the LEED interpretationLEED Interpretations are official answers to technical inquiries about implementing LEED on a project. They help people understand how their projects can meet LEED requirements and provide clarity on existing options. LEED Interpretations are to be used by any project certifying under an applicable rating system. All project teams are required to adhere to all LEED Interpretations posted before their registration date. This also applies to other addenda. Adherence to rulings posted after a project registers is optional, but strongly encouraged. LEED Interpretations are published in a searchable database at usgbc.org. ID#10421.

1
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 16 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Table 1.4 will not work at all for 90.1-2010 since it is based entirely on 90.1-2007. For LEED you will need to use the Minimum Energy Performance Calculator (MEPC). This combines the majority of information from the prerequisite form and the Section 1.4 tables. If the EN-1 does indeed include all (meaning everything) the information in the MEPC then you could submit it as a substitute. My guess is that it would not include everything, the reviewer may not be at all familiar with it, and using it would likely result in your having to provide responses to may additional review comment caused by the confusion that would be created. So it may save you some time up front and then cost you time later.

2
3
0
Christie Morris-Withers NIKA May 16 2017 LEEDuser Member 2 Thumbs Up

HI Marcus,

Where do I find the referenced Minimum Energy Performance Calculator (MEPC). I searched in the credit reference library for the prerequisite EAp2 and could not locate it. Is there any other reference library?

Thanks, I think I found it. Is it the MEPC _v08 updated April 14, 2017? I'm doing a healthcare project and the form directed me to the resources tab in the local credit library, but it is not there. I found it by Goggling it outside of LEED online and it gave me the link to location in USGBC site.

Thanks

3
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 17 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

That is it.

I have found what you discovered - it is often better to search for something on USGBC's web site through Google than trying to find it on their site or trying to search on their site.

Post a Reply
0
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager Termoservice OOD
May 11 2017
LEEDuser Member
477 Thumbs Up

Lagre building modeling suggestion

Project Location: Russian Federation

Greetings,
The project we are modeling is a huge one - a little more than 900 000 sq ft and it is not C&S. Up to third floor (including two basement and two above ground floors) all areas are connected.
As of third floor, the building is split into three independent corpuses (independent also in respect to the HVAC systems).
Modeling the project as a whole (following that the Baseline systems should be one for each floor - system 7) it will be rather slow due to the huge calculation volume imposed to the modeling software, especially when calculating all the 8760 hours, etc.
The question is:
Could we split the building into 4 parts - one for the common areas (up to 3th floor part,) and one for every corpus. The calculation results afterwards will be assembled in the Minimum Energy Performance Calculator.
Following the above suggested approach we’ll minimize the eventual errors and software problem that might arise and at the same time we are complying the appendix G requirement of modeling system 7 (which is the project's system).
Looking forward to your advice.
Thanks.

1
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 11 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

You could probably do so if the sections had completely independent HVAC and the connections between the pieces was all adiabatic.

2
3
0
Vassil Vassilev Manager, Termoservice OOD May 11 2017 LEEDuser Member 477 Thumbs Up

Thanks for the reply Marcus,
Could you please tell me what you mean by “connections between the pieces was all adiabatic”.
As I've mentioned the three building parts are completely HVAC independent, just the areas below third floors are structurally connected. That was the reason why I’ve suggested to split into 4 parts.
Your comments are highly appreciated.
Thanks.

3
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 11 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Adiabatic - relating to or denoting a process or condition in which heat does not enter or leave the system concerned.

If the connection between the pieces has the same temperature setting and therefore heat will not flow from one section to another, then it is adiabatic. you should be able to set up your model so that this is the case.

Post a Reply
0
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer T&T Green
May 08 2017
Guest
806 Thumbs Up

basecase System

Dear Concern:-

Greetings

Our project is G+5 but A/c spaces are located in 3 Floors only and A/c area is totally below 10000 Square feet only (electrical heating only)

so we have some queries in selection of the base case system

1.What is our base case system (System 04 or System 06)
2.Is the base case system selection based on no of floor or no of conditioning floor

1
5
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 08 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

1. Sounds like a 4
2. It is based on conditioned space. See the note under Table G3.1.1A

2
5
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer, T&T Green May 10 2017 Guest 806 Thumbs Up

Dear Concern:-

As per G3.1.1A we need to select system 8 because our project consist of 6 no of floors but no of A/c spaces and A/c area is very low

A/c Area is just 4000 Square feet only and no of A/c spaces are just 5 only

so please clarify how the base case system selection done, based on no of floor or no of conditioning floor

If we take system 4 as base case means how we justify the base case selection

3
5
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 10 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Baseline system selection is based on the number of CONDITIONED floors, the area and the heating source. If you don't have a heating source you use electric. See G3.1.1 which indicates it is based on CONDITIONED floor area.

4
5
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer, T&T Green May 11 2017 Guest 806 Thumbs Up

Awaiting for your Reply

5
5
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer, T&T Green May 11 2017 Guest 806 Thumbs Up

Awaiting for reply

Post a Reply
0
0
Vernon Smith Principal Engineer Smith Energy Engineers, LLC
May 05 2017
LEEDuser Member
40 Thumbs Up

Baseline HVAC schedules

Project Location: United States

The project will apply for certification under LEED v2009 NC. The Proposed design is a 50,000 sf three story building (two above ground plus a full basement) with a central atrium. It includes a large cafeteria and some office space. The cafeteria is largely open due to a central atrium and open passage ways in to the kitchen and back-of-house support areas. The HVAC system consists of four large identical DOAS air-handlers that deliver conditioned air to the kitchen, serveries, and dining areas. There are some heat pumps to serve loads at the peripheral zones that do not provide outside air. During occupied hours, when the kitchen and servery exhaust systems are running, the four air-handlers provide outside air to all of the dining areas as well as the serveries and the kitchen with large amounts being transfer air from the dining areas to the serveries to provide replacement air for the exhaust hoods. The mechanical design calls for two of the four DOAS air-handlers to run at 50% speed during unoccupied hours to provide building pressurization and heating or cooling of the delivered air. This would be the equivalent of all four running at 25% speed, delivering one-quarter of the occupied outside air amount.

The Baseline qualifies for System 5, VAVVariable Air Volume (VAV) is an HVAC conservation feature that supplies varying quantities of conditioned (heated or cooled) air to different parts of a building according to the heating and cooling needs of those specific areas. with Reheat, one system per floor. The kitchen and serveries on the ground level floor qualify for G3.1.1 Exception b due the high loads in the kitchen and serveries, so System 3, PSZ-AC is used for these zones. The kitchen and servery exhaust is turned off during unoccupied periods, so the PSZ-AC units could be off as well, but cycle at night.

My question is how to assign availability schedules to the baseline HVAC systems when essentially there is no transfer air. The three VAV with Reheat AHUs would be the appropriate units to run overnight to provide comparable building ventilation overnight. Should all three run at 25% speed overnight? Should the PSZ-AC systems for the kitchen and serveries run at 25% speed overnight (not sure this could be modeled)?

Thanks in advance for ideas and guidance!

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 08 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

The outside air is required to be shut off during unoccupied hours by the mandatory provisions in Section 6.4. For LEED your design must comply with all mandatory provisions. So you can't bring in OA during unoccupied periods. You can cycle the systems to maintain temperature settings during unoccupied periods.

Post a Reply
0
0
R2M Solution Srl R2M Solution Srl
May 02 2017
LEEDuser Member
236 Thumbs Up

light density in wellness center

Project Location: Italy

What space type shall be considered for a wellness center (e.g. for a sauna or for Turkish baths) according to Table 9.6.1 in order to determine the lighting power density for the baseline model?
Best Regards

1
2
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group May 02 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Obviously there is no space type that fits. The illumination levels in those spaces are usually pretty low. One way to approach it would be to find the recommended illumination levels for this space type, then find a similar space type with the same illumination levels that is in 9.6.1 and use that LPDLighting power density (LPD) is the amount of electric lighting, usually measured in watts per square foot, being used to illuminate a given space..

2
2
0
David Eldridge Project Manager, Grumman/Butkus Associates May 05 2017 Guest 1021 Thumbs Up

If the LPDLighting power density (LPD) is the amount of electric lighting, usually measured in watts per square foot, being used to illuminate a given space. is very low for this space, and if this wellness center is part of a larger facility that otherwise has matching space types, then you might consider the lighting to be a process load for the wellness space and model both proposed and baseline identically. For a facility where this was a small part of the overall total it may not affect the results to a large degree.

Post a Reply
0
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer T&T Green
Apr 24 2017
Guest
806 Thumbs Up

LEED V3 - Datacenter

Dear Concern:-

Our project is LEED v3 NC project (the project is primarily a data center)

The project process load is more than 70% so we plan to do exceptional calculation for server racks is there any specific calculations and procedure for datacenter equipment

can we follow LEED V4 datacenter sheet for exceptional calculations
What is the base case equipment and what is PUEPower utilization effectiveness: ameasure of how efficiently a data center uses its power; specifically, how much power is used by computing equipment rather than for cooling and other overhead. for Base case

as per LEED V4 datacenter we need to create 2 proposed case one for full load another for startup load but our project was started with full IT load initially so we don't have to create initial startup IT load model

So please advise how to handle these isuues

1
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Apr 24 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

Yes you can use the v4 calculator - http://www.usgbc.org/resources/minimum-energy-performance-data-center-ca...

The calculator creates the basecase. Makes sense to ignore the startup load if it is the same as the full load.

2
3
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer, T&T Green Apr 26 2017 Guest 806 Thumbs Up

Dear Concern:-

1.the project is LEED v2009 but this calculator is for LEED v4 can we use it for submission
2.How to proceed exceptional calculation for server based on this sheet
3.Is it possible to use some other server other than this sheet for base case to do exceptional calculation with technical comparison , three facility used the same base case server with in last five year
4.How to take server base case by use this sheet this sheet have help to prove electrical system saving only please advise us

3
3
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Apr 26 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

1. When you visit the link it says that you can use this for LEED 2009 projects.
2. Follow the instructions.
3. You could try to do that but you will need to provide sufficient justification for the baseline. This entails more risk but it is possible.
4. I am not sure what you mean.

Post a Reply
0
0
SAMY Chamy Enginneer T&T Green
Apr 20 2017
Guest
806 Thumbs Up

LEED v2009 Minimum Energy Performance Calculator

Dear Concern:-

1.Is the LEED v2009 Minimum Energy Performance Calculator sheet is mandatory for LEED 2009 project submission

2.what is the difference between Revised Section 1 4 Tables (Jan 2014) sheet and LEED v2009 Minimum Energy Performance Calculator

1
1
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Apr 20 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

1. No

2. The MEPC includes some addtional inputs but also removes some. The major change is that the modeling results go in the MEPC instead of the form.

So if you have the v5 EAp2 form you should use the 1.4 Tables, if you have the v6 or later form then use the MEPC. If you don't want to use the MEPC and have the newer form you can request that GBCIThe Green Building Certification Institute (GBCI) manages Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) building certification and professional accreditation processes. It was established in 2008 with support from the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC). replace the form with the older version.

Whatever you do don't use the newer form with the 1.4 tables because you will not be providing a comparative summary of the modeling results and you will then have a cranky reviewer.

Post a Reply
0
0
Nikhil Kumar
Apr 13 2017
Guest
336 Thumbs Up

Baseline EER - System 2 PTHP

Project Location: Saudi Arabia

As per Table 6.8.1D, I observed the following

EER = 12.3-(0.213*Cap/1000) EER

Also, Cap means the rated cooling capacity of the product in BtuA unit of energy consumed by or delivered to a building. A Btu is an acronym for British thermal unit and is defined as the amount of energy required to increase the temperature of 1 pound of water by 1 degree Fahrenheit, at normal atmospheric pressure. Energy consumption is expressed in Btu to allow for consumption comparisons among fuels that are measured in different units./hr. If the unit's capacity is less than 7000 Btu/hr, use 7000 Btu/hr in the calculation.
If the unit's capacity is higher than 15000 Btu/hr, use 15000 Btu/hr in the calculation.

Questions:

What capacity used in the calculation for capacities between 7000 Btu/hr and 15000 Btu/hr. (This is not mentioned)

Capacity should be arrived from basecase energy model or proposed havc system's capacity

If arrived from basecase means, whether the coooling, heating capacity should be oversized by 15%, 25% respectively or not?

What is the meaning of rated cooling capacity of the product? (is this based on proposed model of ac system)

Please help.

1
2
0
Nikhil Kumar Apr 16 2017 Guest 336 Thumbs Up

could any one help me on the query above? Please

2
2
0
Marcus Sheffer LEED Fellow, 7group Apr 21 2017 LEEDuser Expert 70003 Thumbs Up

We have a saying - good, fast, cheap - pick two. I won't compromise good and I do this for free so . . . sorry for the delay.

The table serves dual purposes.

For the baseline system efficiency determination - Between the minimum and the maximum capacities (7,000 and 15,000) you use the actual capacity derived from the auto-sizing in the baseline model based on the 15%/25% oversizing requirement.

This table in the standard is also used to spell out the minimum efficiency required of the proposed equipment. This is a mandatory provision so the proposed equipment must comply. In that case you would use the rated or actual capacity of the equipment.

Post a Reply
0
0
Nikhil Kumar
Apr 13 2017
Guest
336 Thumbs Up

System 2 - LEED Fan Power ASHRAE 90.1.2007

Project Location: Saudi Arabia

Hi,

Greetings!

I am doing Energy Model for Labor Accommodation. I have some doubts and need your help,

Baseline system will be system 2 as per ASHRAE 90.1.2007. Since, the project is matching with residential category. For Baseline Model, Fan power requirement is 0.3 W/cfm.
Further, Our software needs the following inputs for fan power.
1. Power (i.e. fan power)
2. Temperature Rise
3. Motor Efficiency

Whether this 0.3w/cfm is including efficiency of the motor or without efficiency.
How to calculate temperature Rise & efficiency manually & do u have any spreadsheet. Please

Thanks......

Start a new comment thread

Jun 23 2017
Type the characters you see in this picture. (verify using audio)
Type the characters you see in the picture above; if you can't read them, submit the form and a new image will be generated. Not case sensitive.

Copyright 2017 – BuildingGreen, Inc.