-
Use natural infiltration
Many project teams are reluctant to attempt this credit because conventionally engineered solutions don’t always meet LEED requirements. Don’t be deterred. The best and easiest way to improve the quality of stormwater is to let water permeate the ground through increased landscaping and reduced impervious areas. As long as your soil type has a good infiltration rate, letting stormwater seep into the ground will treat 100% of the pollutants associated with the stormwater runoff. Let natural infiltration do as much of the work possible before using more expensive mechanical methods. In urban sites, infiltration options can be very limited and a rainwater cistern or green roof might be the best approach for credit compliance.
Pollution Prevention
This credit deals with...
Step-by-step credit help
Got the gist of the LEED credit but not sure how to actually achieve it? LEEDuser gives step-by-step help. Members get:
- Checklists covering all the key action steps you'll need to earn the credit.
- Hot tips to give you shortcuts and avoid pitfalls.
- Cost tips to assess what a credit will actually cost, and how to make it affordable.
- Ideas for going beyond LEED with best practices.
- All checklists organized by project phase.
- On-the-fly suggestions on useful items from the Documentation Toolkit, Resources, and Credit Language.
-
Credit language straight from USGBC
Need to check up on the exact LEED credit language from the LEED Rating System on the fly? LEEDuser includes the verbatim language. Members get:
- Easy access to the official LEED credit language with just a couple of clicks.
- On the jobsite without your bulky LEED Reference Guide? Check up on the credit language details here.
- Credit language content is used by permission of the U.S. Green Building Council.
Your credit-by-credit reference library
Why waste time chasing down referenced standards and supporting resources when LEEDuser links you directly to the ones you need? LEEDuser has gathered all the best tools out there and organized them by credit for easy reference. Members get links to:
- Organizations that can give information or help on a credit.
- Standards or studies that are key reference points for credits and prerequisites.
- Articles that help explain important topics.
- Key documents or references for credit inputs.
- Software tools you can use to run calculations or simulations.
Documentation Toolkit
In the end, LEED is all about documentation. LEEDuser’s Documentation Toolkit saves you time and helps you avoid mistakes with:
- Calculators to help assess credit compliance.
- Tracking spreadsheets for materials purchases.
- Spreadsheets and forms to give to subs and other team members.
- Guidance documents on arcane LEED issues.
- Sample templates to help guide your narratives and LEED Online submissions.
- Examples of actual submissions from certified LEED projects.
Sign in for complete access
Not a member yet? LEEDuser membership gives you access to all credit tips, checklists, documentation samples, and more.
Monthly Individual Membership (auto-renews):
Access to all content, cancel anytime—$9.95/month
Annual Individual Membership (auto-renews):
Access to all content, cancel anytime—$99.95/year
Annual Team Membership:
Access for up to 10 members—$349.95/year





9 Comments
BMP Criteria.
Hello,
Part of our stormwater management strategies is to collect and treat stormwater. The treated water will then be used for flushing and irrigation purposes. The Stormwater collection and treatment scheme has been designed in accordance to the International Plumbing Code (IPCInternational Plumbing Code), which is commonly used in the region (Middle East). H
My questions are:
1) Is it an issue if the IPC does not specifically refer to the 80% of TSSTotal suspended solids (TSS) are particles that are too small or light to be removed from stormwater via gravity settling. Suspended solid concentrations are typically removed via filtration. removal criterion ?
2) Should I submit calculations showing what will theTSS (in ppmParts per million.) be following the filtration process ?
Thanks,
George, reducing the quantity of stormwater through collection and use is a common and effective strategy for achieving this credit. I don't think you need to pay close attention to documenting how the collected water will be filtered for this credit, but any water that is not collected will need this documentation.
Annual Rainfall Volume Calculation
The civil engineer on my project is having trouble finding a source for exactly how the annual rainfall volume is supposed to be calculated. Can anyone point me (us) to an example or resource that will clarify this? The reference guide mentions it, but doesn't actually spell out how it is to be calculated.
Jeremy, have you checked out our tips above under Bird's Eye View, Checklists, Resources, and Doc Toolkit? Since your question is fairly broad, I would point you there to begin with. Let us know if you have further questions.
Tristan,
I have the same question as Jeremy, but I'm not sure where to find the sources you mentioned - Bird's Eye View, Checklists, Resources, Doc Toolkit...could please post links to them?
Thank you!
Marcio,
The sources Tristan mentioned are at the top of this page. Scroll up to see them.
Scope - Project Site or Campus
We are pursuing this credit for a new building on an existing corporate campus, Initial review came back and said we had to demonstrate treatment for entire campus flows, not just project site flows. Has anyone else had this interpretation?
The LEED application guide for campuses states that:
"A master planning approach to storm water management and overall impervious surface
management that is campus-wide or based on the local watershed is preferred over stormwater
management planning limited to one project site at a time."
I can't speak to whether reviewers are always asking for this, but it does seem to be a clear policy preference for LEED.
Tristan - Thanks for the insight. I did find a case where Harvard was able to get this credit via an alternative compliance path, demonstrating that while they did not meet the strict interpretation of the criteria for the entire campus, they achieve the improvements in each of the desired areas:
- reducing impervious cover,
- increasing on-site infiltration,
- eliminating sources of contaminants, and
- removing pollutants from stormwater
Here's the link to their credit submittal:
http://green.harvard.edu/theresource/leed-submit/nc/documents/10_Akron_S...
Please register to use the forum.